SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2024
Device-assisted intravesical chemotherapy versus bacillus Calmette-Guerin for intermediate or high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic reviewer and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epirubicin and Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Comparison of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a matched-pair analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of device-assisted intravesical chemotherapy compared to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in the treatment of patients with intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
methodsIn February 2023, a systematic search was conducted on the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest were performed. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42023398559.
resultsA total of 10 studies involving 1160 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared to BCG, device-assisted chemotherapy had a lower recurrence rate (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48-0.84, p = 0.001), longer recurrence-free survival (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.88, p = 0.006), and lower incidence of fever (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.44, p = 0.0002). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of progression, overall survival, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall adverse events, serious adverse events, hematuria, allergy, and general discomfort. Subgroup analysis revealed that neither chemohyperthermia (CHT) nor electromotive drug administration (EMDA) showed statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes compared to BCG. Regarding adverse events, both CHT and EMDA groups showed lower rates of fever compared to the BCG group (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.67, p = 0.005, and OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.05-0.37, p < 0.0001, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the remaining adverse events between either the CHT or EMDA group and the BCG group.
conclusionDevice-assisted intravesical chemotherapy appears to be a safe and viable alternative to BCG for patients with intermediate and high-risk NMIBC, showing comparable oncological outcomes and adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.