SynthesisCJEM2023
Rates of 30-day revisit to the emergency department among older adults living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a virtual iSupport Program on carers and people with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Analyzing the Reasons and Hospital Admission Rates of 72-Hour Emergency Department Revisits.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
- Survival analysis of older adults with dementia: predicting factors after unplanned hospitalization in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOlder adults visit emergency departments (EDs) at higher rates than their younger counterparts. However, less is known about the rate at which older adults living with dementia visit and revisit EDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the revisit rate to the ED among older adults living with a dementia diagnosis.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as gray literature, to identify observational studies reporting on older adults living with dementia that revisited an ED within 30 days of a prior ED visit. We calculated pooled rates of 30-day revisit as percentages using random effects models, and conducted stratified analyses by study data source, study population, and study period. We assessed between-studies heterogeneity using the I
resultsWe identified six articles for inclusion. Percentages of 30-day ED revisit among older adults living with dementia ranged widely from 16.1% to 58.0%. The overall revisit rate of 28.6% showed significant heterogeneity. Between-studies heterogeneity across all stratified analyses was also high. By data source, 30-day revisit percentages were 52.3% (public hospitals) and 20.0% (administrative databases); by study population, revisit percentages were 33.5% (dementia as main population) and 19.8% (dementia as a subgroup). By study period, revisit percentages were 41.2% (5 years or greater) and 18.9% (5 years or less).
conclusionExisting literature on ED revisits among older adults living with dementia highlights the medical complexities and challenges surrounding discharge and follow-up care that may cause these patients to seek ED care at an increased rate. ED personnel may play an important role in connecting patients and caregivers to more appropriate medical and social resources in order to deliver an efficient and more rounded approach to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37659987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.