Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37659660›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2023

Primary tumor site for localized Merkel cell carcinoma drives different management strategies without impacting oncologic outcomes.

Samuel Cass, Brandon Cope, Andrew J Bishop, Yi-Ju Chiang, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Ahsan Farooqi, William Morrison, Russell G Witt, Riyad N H Seervai, Adam S Garden and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel CassDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Brandon CopeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Andrew J BishopDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Yi-Ju ChiangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
B Ashleigh GuadagnoloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Ahsan FarooqiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
William MorrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Russell G WittDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Riyad N H SeervaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States.
Adam S GardenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Ryan P GoepfertDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Merrick RossDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Jeffrey E GershenwaldDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Michael WongDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Phyu P AungDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Emily Z KeungDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Devarati MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States. Electronic address: dmitra@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003168 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MILLER, CHARLES C · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeClinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been associated with high rates of disease relapse. This study examines how primary tumor anatomic site drives patterns of care and outcomes in a large cohort treated in the contemporary era. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatterns of care and associated outcomes were evaluated for clinically Stage I-II MCC patients treated at our institution with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) to the primary site and/or regional nodal basin as a component of their curative intent therapy between 2014-2021.

resultsOf 80 patients who met inclusion criteria, the primary tumor anatomic site was head and neck (HN) for 42 (53%) and non-head and neck (NHN) for 38 (47%). Primary tumor risk factors were similar between cohorts. Fewer patients with HN tumors had wide local excision (WLE; HN-81% vs. NHN-100% p < 0.01). Of those undergoing WLE, patients with HN tumors received higher dose adjuvant RT (>50 Gy: HN-70% vs. NHN-8%; p < 0.01). Patients with HN tumors were less likely to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (HN-62%vs. NHN-100%; p < 0.01) and more likely to have elective nodal RT (HN-48% vs. NHN-0%). Despite varying management strategies, there was no significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (3-yr LRFS HN-94% vs. NHN-94%; p = 0.97), nodal recurrence-free survival (3-yr NRFS HN-89% vs. NHN-85%; p = 0.71) or overall recurrence-free survival (3-yr RFS 73% HN vs. 80% NHN; p = 0.44).

conclusionsAmong patients with primary MCC who had RT as a component of their initial treatment strategy, anatomically-driven heterogeneous treatment approaches were associated with equally excellent locoregional disease control.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnatomic siteMerkel cell carcinomaRadiation therapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID37659660
PMCPMC11378340
OpenAlexW4386374957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.