Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37659443›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2024

Network Analysis of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Brain Volume in Individuals With and Without Major Depressive Disorder or Social Anxiety Disorder.

Qimin Liu, Delaney Davey, Jagan Jimmy, Olusola Ajilore, Heide Klumpp

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qimin LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Delaney DaveyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: ddavey3@uic.edu.
Jagan JimmyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Olusola AjiloreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Heide KlumppDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Illinois Chicago · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029879 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 2009 to 2011
$11.0M
Transdiagnostic Brain-Behavior Profiling to Enhance Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ResponseR01MH112705 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KLUMPP, HEIDE · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029879NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial anxiety disorder (SAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are characterized by behavioral abnormalities in motivational systems, namely the behavioral inhibition system (BIS) and behavioral activation system (BAS). Limited studies indicate brain volume in regions that support emotion, learning/memory, reward, and cognitive functions relate to BIS/BAS. To increase understanding of BIS/BAS, the current study used a network approach.

methodsPatients with SAD (n = 59), patients with MDD (n = 64), and healthy control participants (n = 36) completed a BIS/BAS questionnaire and structural magnetic resonance imaging scans; volumetric regions of interest comprised cortical and limbic structures based on previous BIS/BAS studies. A Bayesian Gaussian graphical model was used for each diagnostic group, and groups were compared. Among network metrics, bridge centrality was of primary interest. Analysis of variance evaluated BIS/BAS behaviors between groups.

resultsBridge centrality showed hippocampus positively related to BAS, but not to BIS, in the MDD group; no findings were observed in the SAD or control groups. Yet, network density (i.e., overall strength of relationships between variables) and degree centrality (i.e., overall relationship between one variable to all other variables) showed that cortical (e.g., precuneus, medial orbitofrontal) and subcortical (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus) regions differed between diagnostic groups. Analysis of variance results showed BAS was lower in the MDD/SAD groups compared with the control group, while BIS was higher in the SAD group relative to the MDD group, which in turn was higher than the control group.

conclusionsPreliminary findings indicate that network-level aberrations may underlie motivational abnormalities in MDD and SAD. Evidence of BIS/BAS differences builds on previous work that points to shared and distinct motivational differences in internalizing psychopathologies.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderPhobia, SocialAdultFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBASBISBrain volumeMajor depressionNetwork analysisSocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID37659443
PMCPMC10904669
OpenAlexW4386374890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.