Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37659278›Full record

ArticleCognitive psychology2023

A spatially continuous diffusion model of visual working memory.

Alex Fennell, Roger Ratcliff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamics of working memory drift and information flow across the cortical hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex FennellThe Ohio State University, United States.
Roger RatcliffThe Ohio State University, United States. Electronic address: ratcliff.22@osu.edu.

Funding

Toward using comprehensive decision-making models in neuropsychological testingR01AG041176 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2012 to 2021
$3.8M
Decision Making on Continuous Scales in Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseR01AG057841 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Decision Making on Continuous Scales in Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseR56AG057841 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKOON, GAIL A, RATCLIFF, ROGER · 2017 to 2017
$576k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041176NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057841NIA NIH HHS R56 AG057841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present results from five visual working memory (VWM) experiments in which participants were briefly shown between 2 and 6 colored squares. They were then cued to recall the color of one of the squares and they responded by choosing the color on a continuous color wheel. The experiments provided response proportions and response time (RT) measures as a function of angle for the choices. Current VWM models for this task include discrete models that assume an item is either within working memory or not and resource models that assume that memory strength varies as a function of the number of items. Because these models do not include processes that allow them to account for RT data, we implemented them within the spatially continuous diffusion model (SCDM, Ratcliff, 2018) and use the experimental data to evaluate these combined models. In the SCDM, evidence retrieved from memory is represented as a spatially continuous normal distribution and this drives the decision process until a criterion (represented as a 1-D line) is reached, which produces a decision. Noise in the accumulation process is represented by continuous Gaussian process noise over spatial position. The models that fit best from the discrete and resource-based classes converged on a common model that had a guessing component and that allowed the height of the normal memory-strength distribution to vary with number of items. The guessing component was implemented as a regular decision process driven by a flat evidence distribution, a zero-drift process. The combination of choice and RT data allows models that were not identifiable based on choice data alone to be discriminated.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallCuesHumansNormal DistributionReaction TimeResponse timeSpatially continuous diffusion modelVisual working memory

Identifiers

PMID37659278
PMCPMC10546276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.