Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37659032›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2023

Modelling Spillover Effects on Informal Carers: The Carer QALY Trap.

David J Mott, Hannah Schirrmacher, Hareth Al-Janabi, Sophie Guest, Becky Pennington, Nicolas Scheuer, Koonal K Shah, Chris Skedgel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David J MottOffice of Health Economics, 2nd Floor, Goldings House, Hay's Galleria, 2 Hay's Lane, London, SE1 2HB, UK. dmott@ohe.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-8447
Hannah SchirrmacherOffice of Health Economics, 2nd Floor, Goldings House, Hay's Galleria, 2 Hay's Lane, London, SE1 2HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9280-4537
Hareth Al-JanabiHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-8310
Sophie GuestRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Becky PenningtonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-022X
Nicolas ScheuerRoche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Koonal K ShahNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4927-7858
Chris SkedgelOffice of Health Economics, 2nd Floor, Goldings House, Hay's Galleria, 2 Hay's Lane, London, SE1 2HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4989-8846
Office Of Health Economics · GBRoche (United Kingdom) · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of informal (unpaid) care can impose significant 'spillover effects' on carers, and accounting for these effects is consistent with the efficiency and equity objectives of health technology assessment (HTA). Inclusion of these effects in health economic models, particularly carer health-related quality of life (QOL), can have a substantial impact on net quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains and the relative cost effectiveness of new technologies. Typically, consideration of spillover effects improves the value of a technology, but in some circumstances, consideration of spillover effects can lead to situations whereby life-extending treatments for patients may be considered cost ineffective due to their impact on carer QOL. In this piece we revisit the classic 'QALY trap' and introduce an analogous 'carer QALY trap' which may have practical implications for economic evaluations where the inclusion of carer QOL reduces incremental QALY gains. Such results may align with a strict QALY-maximisation rule, however we consider the extent to which this principle may be at odds with the preferences of carers themselves (and possibly society more broadly), potentially leading decision makers into the carer QALY trap as a result. We subsequently reflect on potential solutions, highlighting the important (albeit limited) role that deliberation has to play in HTA.

Indexed as

CaregiversQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID37659032
PMCPMC10635951
OpenAlexW4386392657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.