ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2023
The evolution of spinal cord surgery: history, people, instruments, and results.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The disparity in pediatric spinal cord tumor clinical trials: A scoping review of registered clinical trials from 1989 to 2023.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Simultaneous spine extradural and intradural teratomas in a pediatric patient: A rare presentation with insights in the flawed migration of germ cells theory.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal cord surgery has and always will be a challenging operation with satisfying results, but also with potentially devastating results. Over the last century, there has been an evolution in the way we perceive and conduct spinal cord surgery. The phenomenal evolution in technology from the very first x-ray pictures helps to localize the spinal pathology through the use of high-resolution MRI and ultrasonography that allows for high precision surgery with relatively minimal exposure.
methodsThe advancements in the surgical technique and the utilization of neuromonitoring allow for maximal safe resection of these delicate and intricate tumors. We also are beginning to understand the biology of spinal cord tumors and vascular lesions, as in the recent 2021 WHO classification which identifies specific entities such as spinal ependymomas, MYCN-amplified, as separate entity from the other subtypes of ependymomas. Surgeons have also accepted the importance of maximal safe resection for most of the spinal cord pathologies rather than just performing biopsy and adjuvant treatment.
conclusionThere have been significant advances since the first resection of an intramedullary tumor including diagnosis, imaging, and surgical technique for children. These advances have improved the prognosis and outcome in these children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37658937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.