Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658912›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

Prospective randomized controlled trial: early weight bearing after conservative treatment of Weber B ankle fractures (pancake trial).

R C Stassen, S Franssen, B Meesters, B Boonen, E R de Loos, R van Vugt

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R C StassenDepartment of Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6196-6966
S FranssenDepartment of Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
B MeestersDepartment of Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
B BoonenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
E R de LoosDepartment of Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
R van VugtDepartment of Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands. r.vanvugt@zuyderland.nl.
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDifferent studies have shown that weightbearing is safe in stable transsyndesmotic, isolated lateral simple ankle fractures. Despite this evidence, AO guidelines still recommend immobilization with above-the-knee cast for 4-6 weeks for these fractures. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of mobilization and weightbearing to those of immobilization and non-weightbearing in patients with stable transsyndesmotic, lateral isolated simple ankle fractures.

methodsFifty patients were randomly assigned to permissive weightbearing in a walking boot or non-weightbearing immobilization using a below-the-knee cast. Primary outcome was ankle functionality as scored by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary outcomes were radiological displacement of fracture, range of motion (ROM), calf circumference, and RAND 36-item health survey. Patients were in follow-up for 24 months.

resultsAnkle functionality after six and twelve weeks was significantly higher for the intervention group, with respectively 30 points (p = 0.001) and 10 points (p = 0.015) of difference. ROM improved significantly in the intervention group after six weeks. All fractures showed radiological progression of fracture healing. RAND 36-item showed differences in both physical (60.3 vs. 46.3, p = 0.017) and mental (78.5 vs. 58.2, p = 0.034) components in favor of the intervention group. In 16% of patients who initially showed stable fractures on radiographic imaging, joint dislocation was identified on weightbearing radiographs prior to randomization, leading to exclusion.

conclusionWeightbearing and mobilization using a walking boot may be a safe treatment for patients with stable Weber B fractures.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesConservative TreatmentFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight-BearingCastFunctionalityLateral transsyndesmotic ankle fracturePermissive weightbearingWalking boot

Identifiers

PMID37658912
PMCPMC10771350
OpenAlexW4386393205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.