Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658894›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Longitudinal analysis of new multiple sclerosis lesions with magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor imaging.

Monika Gloor, Michaela Andelova, Laura Gaetano, Athina Papadopoulou, Federico Burguet Villena, Till Sprenger, Ernst-Wilhelm Radue, Ludwig Kappos, Oliver Bieri, Meritxell Garcia

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika GloorDivision of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Michaela AndelovaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Laura GaetanoDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Athina PapadopoulouDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Federico Burguet VillenaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Till SprengerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ernst-Wilhelm RadueMedical Image Analysis Center (MIAC) AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Ludwig KapposDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Oliver BieriDivision of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Meritxell GarciaDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. meritxell.garciaalzamora@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7946-4657
University Hospital of Basel · CHCharles University · CZNovartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe potential of magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for the detection and evolution of new multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions was analyzed.

methodsNineteen patients with MS obtained conventional MRI, MTI, and DTI examinations bimonthly for 12 months and again after 24 months at 1.5 T MRI. MTI was acquired with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) in 10 min (1.3 mm

resultsAt the time of their appearance on MRI, the 21 newly detected MS lesions showed significantly reduced MTR/F/kf and prolonged T1/T2 parameters, as well as significantly reduced FA and increased AD/MD/RD. Significant differences were already observed for MTR 4 months and for qMT parameters 2 months prior to lesions' detection on MRI. DTI did not show any significant pre-lesional differences. Slightly reversed trends were observed for most lesions up to 8 months after their detection for qMT and less pronounced for MTR and three diffusion parameters, while appearing unchanged on MRI.

conclusionsMTI provides more information than DTI in MS lesions and detects tissue changes 2 to 4 months prior to their appearance on MRI. After lesions' detection, qMT parameter changes promise to be more sensitive than MTR for the lesions' evolutional assessment. Overall, bSSFP-based MTI adumbrates to be more sensitive than MRI and DTI for the early detection and follow-up assessment of MS lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: When additionally acquired in routine MRI, fast bSSFP-based MTI can complement the MRI/DTI longitudinal lesion assessment by detecting MS lesions 2-4 months earlier than with MRI, which could implicate earlier clinical decisions and better follow-up/treatment assessment in MS patients. KEY POINTS: • Magnetization transfer imaging provides more information than DTI in multiple sclerosis lesions and can detect tissue changes 2 to 4 months prior to their appearance on MRI. • After lesions' detection, quantitative magnetization transfer changes are more pronounced than magnetization transfer ratio changes and therefore promise to be more sensitive for the lesions' evolutional assessment. • Balanced steady-state free precession-based magnetization transfer imaging is more sensitive than MRI and DTI for the early detection and follow-up assessment of multiple sclerosis lesions.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingMultiple SclerosisAnisotropyBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBalanced steady-state free precessionDiffusion tensor imagingMagnetization transfer ratioMultiple sclerosisQuantitative magnetization transfer

Identifiers

PMID37658894
PMCPMC10873225
OpenAlexW4386390903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.