ArticleEuropean radiology2024
A radiomics-based interpretable model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence versus conventional imaging for differentiating G2/G3 from G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Validation of an XGBoost-SHAP Model for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Elderly Cardiovascular Patients With Polypharmacy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Chinese expert concern and consensus on applications of artificial intelligence in clinical cancer imaging.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Diagnosing breast masses in BI-RADS 4: construction and interpretation of an intralesional and perilesional radiomics nomogram based on digital breast tomosynthesis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Multi-omics profiling of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Interplay of genomic instability and the tumor microenvironment (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Prognostic prediction model for rectal cancer based on CMS subtype indicators and SHAP-based interpretable analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion in clinical stage T1 invasive lung adenocarcinoma using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics: a multicenter development, validation, and comparison study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A Novel Radiomics-Integrated Panel for Preoperative Stratification of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs).Cancers · 2026Article
- Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Interpretable MRI Subregional Radiomics-Deep Learning Model for Preoperative Lymphovascular Invasion Prediction in Rectal Cancer: A Dual-Center Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- PNET-PRISM: a multicenter-validated radiomics nomogram for noninvasive grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Regionally modulated radiomics analysis in PET/CT imaging: application to prognosis prediction of head and neck cancer.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning and radiomics integration for differentiating insulinomas from NF-PNETs in EUS imaging.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Leveraging vision transformer for histological grade prediction in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a large-scale multicenter study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of dual-energy CT-derived iodine maps for predicting histopathologic grading of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a two-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Non-invasive Prediction of Lung Cancer Histological Differentiation via Radiomics and Multi-binary Classification ModelsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model based on multimodal MRI radiomics for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Interpretable model based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting the pathological grades of hepatocellular carcinomas.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- From diagnosis to treatment: navigating the course for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in a non-invasive manner.
methodsPatients with pNETs who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between 2010 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Radiomics features were extracted, and five radiomics-based ML models, namely logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GaussianNB, were developed. The performance of these models was evaluated using a time-independent testing set, and metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The accuracy of the radiomics model was compared to that of needle biopsy. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) tool and the correlation between radiomics and biological features were employed to explore the interpretability of the model.
resultsA total of 122 patients (mean age: 50 ± 14 years; 53 male) were included in the training set, whereas 100 patients (mean age: 48 ± 13 years; 50 male) were included in the testing set. The AUCs for LR, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and GaussianNB were 0.758, 0.742, 0.779, 0.744, and 0.745, respectively, with corresponding accuracies of 73.0%, 70.0%, 77.0%, 71.9%, and 72.9%. The SHAP tool identified two features of the venous phase as the most significant, which showed significant differences among the Ki-67 index or mitotic count subgroups (p < 0.001).
conclusionsAn interpretable radiomics-based RF model can effectively differentiate between G1 and G2/3 of pNETs, demonstrating favorable interpretability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiomics-based interpretable model developed in this study has significant clinical relevance as it offers a non-invasive method for assessing the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and holds promise as an important complementary tool to traditional tissue biopsy. KEY POINTS: • A radiomics-based interpretable model was developed to predict the pathological grade of pNETs and compared with preoperative needle biopsy in terms of accuracy. • The model, based on CT radiomics, demonstrated favorable interpretability. • The radiomics model holds potential as a valuable complementary technique to preoperative needle biopsy; however, it should not be considered a replacement for biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.