Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658884›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

A radiomics-based interpretable model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Jing-Yuan Ye, Peng Fang, Zhen-Peng Peng, Xi-Tai Huang, Jin-Zhao Xie, Xiao-Yu Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing-Yuan Ye *Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Peng Fang *Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Peng Peng *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xi-Tai HuangDepartment of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Zhao XieDepartment of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Yu YinDepartment of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. yinxy@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in a non-invasive manner.

methodsPatients with pNETs who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between 2010 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Radiomics features were extracted, and five radiomics-based ML models, namely logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GaussianNB, were developed. The performance of these models was evaluated using a time-independent testing set, and metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The accuracy of the radiomics model was compared to that of needle biopsy. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) tool and the correlation between radiomics and biological features were employed to explore the interpretability of the model.

resultsA total of 122 patients (mean age: 50 ± 14 years; 53 male) were included in the training set, whereas 100 patients (mean age: 48 ± 13 years; 50 male) were included in the testing set. The AUCs for LR, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and GaussianNB were 0.758, 0.742, 0.779, 0.744, and 0.745, respectively, with corresponding accuracies of 73.0%, 70.0%, 77.0%, 71.9%, and 72.9%. The SHAP tool identified two features of the venous phase as the most significant, which showed significant differences among the Ki-67 index or mitotic count subgroups (p < 0.001).

conclusionsAn interpretable radiomics-based RF model can effectively differentiate between G1 and G2/3 of pNETs, demonstrating favorable interpretability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiomics-based interpretable model developed in this study has significant clinical relevance as it offers a non-invasive method for assessing the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and holds promise as an important complementary tool to traditional tissue biopsy. KEY POINTS: • A radiomics-based interpretable model was developed to predict the pathological grade of pNETs and compared with preoperative needle biopsy in terms of accuracy. • The model, based on CT radiomics, demonstrated favorable interpretability. • The radiomics model holds potential as a valuable complementary technique to preoperative needle biopsy; however, it should not be considered a replacement for biopsy.

Indexed as

Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesInterpretabilityMachine learningPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsPathological gradeRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37658884
PMCPMC10873440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.