SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023
A systematic review of physical function tests as predictors of key clinical outcomes for adults with blood cancers.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body Image: A Bridge Between Depression and Quality of Life in Women With Cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- Improved functional assessment in cancer patients using home-based digital technologies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine which standardized physical performance tests are being used specifically in the assessment of adult patients before, during, or after undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancy and which of these functional tests have been demonstrated to have a correlation with key objective clinical outcome measures including mortality, progression-free survival, complete remission, hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, and hospital length of stay.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE electronic databases were searched up to June 2021. Searches were restricted to English language. All resulting studies from the electronic database search were assessed by two reviewers for original research with physical performance data exclusive to patients with hematological malignancy. Studies with confounding intervention or the inclusion of pediatric patients were excluded. The quality of the remaining studies was assessed using PRISMA guidelines and Tooth Criteria by two reviewers, using a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancies. The main characteristics of each article, including sample size, population characteristics, physical performance testing methods, and significant and non-significant findings were extracted and compared. Additionally, one reviewer performed a literature review of the safety of physical performance testing.
resultsOne thousand two hundred fifty-six screened database results resulted in 14 studies included in the systematic review. All studies scored ≥ 0.59 on the Tooth Criteria, indicating moderate to high quality of reporting. Our review found six recurring measures of objective physical function assessed for correlation with clinical outcomes, primarily morbidity and mortality. The heterogeneity of each study precluded aggregate data analysis.
conclusionsThis review was a first step in evaluating which objective physical performance tests are best suited for identifying functional impairment before, during, and after oncologic treatment for adults with blood cancers. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal objective functional measures to use as a guide in clinical decision-making in the hematologic patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37658864What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.