ArticleJournal of radiation research2023
Radiation-quality-dependent bystander cellular effects induced by heavy-ion microbeams through different pathways.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Soluble factor-mediated enhancement of cell viability via plasma-induced bystander effects.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Microgravity alleviates low-dose radiation-induced non-targeted carcinogenic effects.NPJ microgravity · 2025Article
- Collimation principles of a hollow X-ray microbeam for high-contrast cytoplasm irradiation.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- Condensed Matter Systems Exposed to Radiation: Multiscale Theory, Simulations, and Experiment.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the radiation-quality-dependent bystander cellular effects using heavy-ion microbeams with different ion species. The heavy-ion microbeams were produced in Takasaki Ion Accelerators for Advanced Radiation Application, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology. Carbon (12C5+, 220 MeV), neon (20Ne7+, 260 MeV) and argon (40Ar13+, 460 MeV) ions were used as the microbeams, collimating the beam size with a diameter of 20 μm. After 0.5 and 3 h of irradiation, the surviving fractions (SFs) are significantly lower in cells irradiated with carbon ions without a gap-junction inhibitor than those irradiated with the inhibitor. However, the same SFs with no cell killing were found with and without the inhibitor at 24 h. Conversely, no cell-killing effect was observed in argon-ion-irradiated cells at 0.5 and 3 h; however, significantly low SFs were found at 24 h with and without the inhibitor, and the effect was suppressed using vitamin C and not dimethyl sulfoxide. The mutation frequency (MF) in cells irradiated with carbon ions was 8- to 6-fold higher than that in the unirradiated control at 0.5 and 3 h; however, no mutation was observed in cells treated with the gap-junction inhibitor. At 24 h, the MFs induced by each ion source were 3- to 5-fold higher and the same with and without the inhibitor. These findings suggest that the bystander cellular effects depend on the biological endpoints, ion species and time after microbeam irradiations with different pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.