Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658446›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Amide proton transfer (APT) and magnetization transfer (MT) in predicting short-term therapeutic outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy: a feasibility study of three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.

Wenguang Liu, Xiao Wang, Simin Xie, Weiyin Vivian Liu, Ismail Bilal Masokano, Yu Bai, Juan Chen, Linhui Zhong, Yijing Luo, Gaofeng Zhou and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenguang LiuDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Xiao WangDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Simin XieDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Weiyin Vivian LiuMR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, 100176, China.
Ismail Bilal MasokanoDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Yu BaiDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Juan ChenDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Linhui ZhongDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Yijing LuoDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Gaofeng ZhouDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Wenzheng Li *Department of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. wenzheng727@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-0097
Yigang Pei *Department of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Rd., Kai Fu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. xypyg0731@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071895National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer (3D CEST) technique is a novel and promising magnetic resonance sequence; however, its application in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) lacks sufficient evaluation. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the 3D CEST technique in predicting the short-term treatment outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in NPC patients.

methodsForty NPC patients and fourteen healthy volunteers were enrolled and underwent the pre-treatment 3D CEST magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The reliability of 3D CEST was assessed in healthy volunteers by calculating the intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficient (ICC) for amide proton transfer weighted-signal intensity (APTw-SI) and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) values. NPC patients were divided into residual and non-residual groups based on short-term treatment outcomes after CRT. Whole-tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn to measure APTw-SI, MTR and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Multivariate analysis and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the prediction performance of clinical characteristics, APTw-SI, MTR, ADC values, and combined models in predicting short-term treatment outcomes in NPC patients.

resultsFor the healthy volunteer group, all APTw-SI and MTR values exhibited good to excellent intra- and inter-observer agreements (0.736-0.910, 0.895-0.981, all P > 0.05). For NPC patients, MTR values showed a significant difference between the non-residual and residual groups (31.24 ± 5.21% vs. 34.74 ± 1.54%, P = 0.003) while no significant differences were observed for APTw-SI and ADC values (P > 0.05). Moreover, the diagnostic power of MTR value was superior to APTw-SI (AUC: 0.818 vs. 0.521, P = 0.017) and comparable to ADC values (AUC: 0.818 vs. 0.649, P > 0.05) in predicting short-term treatment outcomes for NPC patients. The prediction performance did not improve even when combining MTR values with APTw-SI and/or ADC values (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe pre-treatment MTR value acquired through 3D CEST demonstrated superior predictive performance for short-term treatment outcomes compared to APTw-SI and ADC values in NPC patients after CRT.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsProtonsAmidesChemoradiotherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNasopharyngeal CarcinomaReproducibility of ResultsAmidesProtonsAmide proton transfer imagingChemical exchange saturation transferChemoradiotherapyMagnetization transferNasopharyngeal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37658446
PMCPMC10474660
OpenAlexW4386355787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.