Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658403›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2023

Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study.

Moberley Sarah, Hewitt Jacqui, Attia John, Cole Janean, Bevington Joelle, Oldmeadow Christopher, Howard Zach, Hughes Rachel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Moberley SarahDepartment of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. Sarah.Moberley@health.nsw.gov.au.
Hewitt JacquiDepartment of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Attia JohnDepartment of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Cole JaneanAnglican Care, Booragul, NSW, Australia.
Bevington JoelleDepartment of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Oldmeadow ChristopherHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Howard ZachFaculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Hughes RachelDepartment of Palliative Care, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidential aged care facilities is one of the most common places to deliver of end of life care. A lack of evidence regarding preferred place for end of life care for residents of aged care facilities impacts on delivery of care and prevents assessment of quality of care. This paper reports the preferences, current status of end of life care and enablers and barriers of care being delivered in line with the wishes of residents of participating aged care facilities.

methodsWe collaborated with six equally sized aged care facilities from the Greater Newcastle area, New South Wales, Australia. An audit of the quality of end of life care for residents was conducted by retrospective medical record review (n = 234 deceased patients). A retrospective review of emergency department transfers was conducted to determine the rate of transfer and assign avoidable or not. Qualitative focus group and individual interviews were conducted and analysed for barriers and enablers to end of life care being delivered in accordance with residents' wishes.

resultsMost residents (96.7%) wished to remain in their residential aged care facility if their health deteriorated in an expected way. Residents of facilities whose model of care integrated nurse practitioners had the lowest rates of emergency department transfers and timelier symptom management at end of life. Family decision making influenced location of death (either supporting or preventing care in place of patient preference). CONCLUSION(S): To better provide care in accordance with a person's wishes, aged care facilities need to be supported to enable end of life care insitu through integrated care with relevant palliative care providers, education and communication strategies. Family and community health and death literacy interventions should accompany clinical innovation to ensure delivery of care in accordance with residents' preferences.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingTerminal CareAgedAustraliaHumansPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesNursing Home CareSymptoms and Symptom ManagementTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID37658403
PMCPMC10472708
OpenAlexW4386379556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.