Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658389›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2023

Medicine donations: a review of policies and practices.

Hannah Permaul Flores, Jillian C Kohler, Deirdre Dimancesco, Anna Wong, Joel Lexchin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah Permaul FloresWHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jillian C KohlerWHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. jillian.kohler@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1290-9484
Deirdre DimancescoDepartment of Health Products Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anna WongWHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Joel LexchinWHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo help promote the effective delivery of drug donations, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Guidelines for Medicine Donations. The need for revisions is timely given the large-scale influx of medicine donations since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyses current policies of donors and recipients that are commensurate with the recommendations in the Guidelines and examines current practices, challenges, and revision suggestions.

resultsA search for medicine donation policies of donors and recipients was conducted in May/June 2022 and repeated in January 2023. Potential donor countries were identified from the high-income countries on the United Nation's (UN) List of G20 Countries. Potential pharmaceutical company donors were selected from those with 2021 revenue of $30 billion or greater. Potential non-government organization donors came from the WHO list of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and two other sources. Potential recipient countries were those on the UN List of Least Developed Countries. These four lists were supplemented with actual donors and recipients identified from the literature. All policies retrieved were screened to identify which of the 12 recommendations from the WHO Guidelines were incorporated. We identified 38 policies from 1 donor country, 6 brand-name multinational pharmaceutical companies, 6 NGOs and 25 recipient countries. Most policies incorporated all 12 recommendations. Twenty-five of the 38 policies were developed in 2010 or later. The majority of actual donors and recipients did not have policies that were publicly available. A rapid literature review for publications from 2010 onwards identified challenges in implementing the WHO Guidelines and suggested for revisions. Challenges included: (1) information management; (2) medication presentation; (3) influence from the pharmaceutical industry; (4) donation sustainability; and (5) the belief that donations are inherently good.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that both donors and recipients could further align their policies with the existing Guidelines and both groups should be consulted on any revisions to ensure that their experiences are reflected and their needs are addressed. While the current WHO Guidelines for Medicine Donations are a solid base for medical humanitarian efforts, evidence points to the need for an update to meet current challenges.

Indexed as

COVID-19Developing CountriesDrug IndustryHumansPandemicsPolicyGlobal humanitarian aidHealth policyNon-governmental organizationsPharmaceutical donation policiesPharmaceutical industryWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID37658389
PMCPMC10474724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.