Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658373›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2023

Development of an addiction recovery patient-reported outcome measure: Response to Addiction Recovery (R2AR).

Elisabeth Okrant, Sharon Reif, Constance M Horgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabeth OkrantInstitute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
Sharon ReifInstitute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA. reif@brandeis.edu.
Constance M HorganInstitute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH SERVICES RES. ON ALCOHOL-RELAT32AA007567 · NIAAA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI SHARON REIF · 1994 to 2026
$9.7M
Piloting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Opioid Use Disorder Recovery in a Clinical SettingR61DA049263 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HORGAN, CONSTANCE M., REIF, SHARON · 2019 to 2020
$865k
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007567NIDA NIH HHS R61 DA049263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecovery, a primary goal of addiction treatment, goes beyond abstinence. Incorporating broad domains with key elements that vary across individuals, recovery is a difficult concept to measure. Most addiction-related quality measurement has emphasized process measures, which limits evaluation of treatment quality and long-term outcomes, whereas patient-reported outcomes are richer and nuanced. To address these gaps, this study developed and tested a patient-reported outcome measure for addiction recovery, named Response to Addiction Recovery (R2AR).

methodsA multi-stage mixed methods approach followed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure development standard. People with lived experience (PWLE) of addiction, treatment providers, and other experts contributed to item distillation and iterative measure refinement. From an item bank of 356 unique items, 57 items were tested via survey and interviews, followed by focus groups and cognitive interviews.

resultsFace validity was demonstrated throughout. PWLE rated item importance higher and with greater variance than providers, yet both agreed that "There are more important things to me in my life than using substances" was the most important item. The final R2AR instrument has 19 items across 8 recovery domains, spanning early, active, and long-term recovery phases. Respondents assess agreement for each item as (1) a strength, and (2) importance to ongoing recovery.

conclusionR2AR allows PWLE to define what is important to their recovery. It is designed to support treatment planning as part of clinical workflows and to track recovery progress. Inclusion of PWLE and providers in the development process enhances its face validity. Including PWLE in the development of R2AR and using the tool to guide recovery planning emphasizes the importance of patient-centeredness in designing clinical tools and involving patients in their own care.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveFocus GroupsHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresClinical assessmentMeasure developmentPatient-reported outcomesQuality measurementRecoverySubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID37658373
PMCPMC10474628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.