Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658337›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Applying the COM-B behaviour change model to a pilot study delivering volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents and insecticide-treated clothing to forest-exposed populations in Mondulkiri Province, Cambodia.

Ingrid Chen, Dyna Doum, Kylie Mannion, John Hustedt, Siv Sovannaroth, David McIver, Michael Macdonald, Neil Lobo, Allison Tatarsky, Margaret A Handley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ingrid ChenMalaria Elimination Initiative, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA. Ingrid.chen@ucsf.edu.
Dyna DoumHealth Forefront Organization, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Kylie MannionMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Australia.
John HustedtMalaria Elimination Initiative, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Siv SovannarothNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
David McIverMalaria Elimination Initiative, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Michael MacdonaldInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Liverpool, UK.
Neil LoboUniversity of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Allison TatarskyMalaria Elimination Initiative, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Margaret A Handley *Malaria Elimination Initiative, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Josselyn Neukom *Malaria Elimination Initiative, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USCambodia National Malaria Center · KHGlobal Brain Health Institute · USInnovative Vector Control Consortium · GBMenzies School of Health Research · AUUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Spatial repellents to reduce the outdoor transmission of malariaK01AI156182 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHEN, INGRID TING-TING · 2021 to 2024
$599k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI156182NIH HHS K01AI156182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoutheast Asia is making tremendous progress towards their 2030 malaria elimination goal but needs new interventions to stop forest malaria. This study trials two new vector control tools, a volatile pyrethroid spatial repellent (VPSR) and insecticide-treated clothing (ITC), amongst forest-exposed populations in Mondulkiri Province Cambodia to inform their potential use for eliminating forest malaria.

methods21 forest-exposed individuals were given a questionnaire on their perceptions of malaria and preventive practices used, after which they trialed two products sequentially. Clothes was treated with ITC by the study team. Mixed methods were used to understand their experience, attitudes, and preferences regarding the products trialed. Quantitative data was summarized and qualitative insights were analysed using thematic analysis, applying the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour Change (COM-B) model and Behaviour Change Wheel Framework to identify intervention functions to support tailored product rollout amongst these populations.

resultsStudy participants reported a need for protection from mosquito bites in outdoor and forest-exposed settings and perceived both products trialed to be effective for this purpose. The VPSR product was preferred when travel was not required, whereas ITC was preferred for ease of use when going to the forest, especially in rainy conditions. COM-B analysis identified that key enablers for use of both products included their perceived efficacy and ease of use, which required no skill or preparation. For barriers to use, the odour of ITC was sometimes perceived as being toxic, as well as its inability to protect uncovered skin from mosquito bites, while the perceived usefulness of the VPSR product trialed was limited by its water sensitivity in rainy forest settings. Intervention components to encourage appropriate and sustained use of these products include education about how to use these products and what to expect, persuasion to use them from community leaders and targeted channels, and enablement to facilitate convenient and affordable access.

conclusionThe rollout of VPSRs and ITC amongst forest-exposed populations can be useful for eliminating malaria in Southeast Asia. Study findings can be applied to increase product uptake among forest exposed populations in Cambodia, while manufacturers can aim to develop products that are rainproof, easy to use in forest settings, and have favourable odour profiles to target users.

Indexed as

Insect Bites and StingsInsecticidesInsect RepellentsPyrethrinsCambodiaClothingForestsHumansPilot ProjectsInsecticidesInsect RepellentsPyrethrinsBehaviour change theoryCOM-B modelForest malaria, CambodiaHigh risk populationInsecticide treated clothingMalaria eliminationPassive emanatorSpatial repellentVolatile pyrethroid

Identifiers

PMID37658337
PMCPMC10472618
OpenAlexW4386373175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.