Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658273›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Impact of Preoperative Tumor Size on Prognosis of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas.

Yoichi Miyata, Naoto Yonamine, Ibuki Fujinuma, Takazumi Tsunenari, Yasuhiro Takihata, Hiroyuki Hakoda, Akiko Nakazawa, Toshimitsu Iwasaki, Takahiro Einama, Junichi Togashi and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoichi MiyataDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-4477
Naoto YonamineDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Ibuki FujinumaDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Takazumi TsunenariDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Yasuhiro TakihataDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroyuki HakodaDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Chiba, Japan.
Akiko NakazawaDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Toshimitsu IwasakiDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Takahiro EinamaDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Junichi TogashiDepartment of Surgery, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Chiba, Japan.
Hironori TsujimotoDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Hideki UenoDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshifumi BeckDepartment of Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yoji KishiDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan. ykishi-3su@ndmc.ac.jp.
National Defense Medical College Hospital · JPAsahi General Hospital · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor size (TS) is a well-established prognostic factor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether a uniform treatment strategy can be applied for all resectable PDACs (R-PDACs) and borderline resectable PDACs (BR-PDACs), regardless of TS, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative TS on surgical outcomes of patients with R-PDACs and BR-PDACs.

methodsChart data from three institutions were reviewed to select patients who underwent pancreatectomy for R-PDACs and BR-PDACs between January 2006 and December 2020. The patients were divided into TS

resultsTS of 35 mm and 24 mm was the best cutoff value in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC, respectively. The R1 rate was higher in the TS

conclusionLarger TS was associated with a higher R1 rate and is a worse prognostic factor in patients with R-PDAC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatectomyPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37658273
OpenAlexW4386386650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.