ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2023
Impact of malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life among adolescents.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 100 most cited articles on malocclusion's biopsychosocial impact in school-aged youth: bibliometric study.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on the clinical strategies for orthodontic treatment with clear aligners.International journal of oral science · 2025Review
- Delayed orthodontic care and its association with depression among Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- From SPECT/CT towards absolute quantification? - the case of unilateral condylar hyperplasia of the mandible.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, non-randomized and observational studies, and previous systematic reviews if matching PECOS strategy. The protocol of the study was registered on PROSPERO. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was conducted in the following five databases: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search was carried out to cover the literature up to June 15, 2022. In addition, ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO were searched for detecting any relevant unpublished data and ongoing studies. STUDY SELECTION: The review was defined in PECOS format as follows: population (P), healthy adolescents (ASA Class I or II; age 10-19); Exposure (E), malocclusion and/or need of orthodontic therapy as determined by professionals utilizing validated standardized tools such as Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need, Peer Assessment Rating, Dental Aesthetic Index, or any well-described tool; comparison (C), no malocclusion and/or need of orthodontic therapy as determined by professionals utilizing validated standardized tools; outcome (O), self-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) using validated tools; study design (S), randomized clinical trials, non-randomized/observational studies (prospective and cross-sectional studies with untreated/no-malocclusion controls), and previous systematic reviews if matching PECOS strategy. Studies assessing ASA Class III or higher, craniofacial conditions, previous or ongoing orthodontic or surgical treatment, and case studies were excluded. DATA ANALYSIS: Screening and data extraction and management, risk of bias (RoB), and quality assessments were conducted by four independent investigators. RoB was assessed based on the guidelines of the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.
resultsA total of 13 studies (non-randomized studies of cross-sectional design) were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which, 4 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis showed that malocclusions (measured with DAI) in adolescents aged 11-14 years old have a negative impact on OHRQoL (measured with CPQ 11-14 short form) (number of studies = 4, rate ratio/prevalence ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-1.18, I
conclusionsModerate level of evidence suggests that malocclusions in adolescents have a negative impact on the oral health-related quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.