Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658155›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2023

Practical use of apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease: lessons from the TOLEDO study and clinical experience.

Tove Henriksen, Regina Katzenschlager, Roongroj Bhidayasiri, Harry Staines, Donna Lockhart, Andrew Lees

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Device aided therapies in Parkinson disease: an expert view on apomorphine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the show must go on.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  10. Monotherapy with infusion therapies - useful or not?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Initiating Apomorphine Therapy Without Antiemetic Pretreatment: Real-World Data From a Nurse-led Parkinson Disease Support Program.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tove HenriksenDepartment of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, University Hospital of Bispebjerg, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. tovehenriksen@dadlnet.dk.
Regina KatzenschlagerDepartment of Neurology and Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neuroimmunological and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
Roongroj BhidayasiriChulalongkorn Centre of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease & Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Harry StainesSigma Statistical Services, Balmullo, UK.
Donna LockhartBritannia Pharmaceuticals Limited, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Andrew LeesUniversity College London Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital, Queen Square, London, UK.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKDonauspital · ATOffice of the Royal SocietyRoyal Statistical Society · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcutaneous apomorphine infusion is a device-aided therapy for Parkinson's disease that can be considered when motor fluctuations become persistent and are no longer adequately controlled by oral/transdermal medication. Apomorphine infusion is less invasive than enteral levodopa, deep brain stimulation or focused ultrasound, and is often indicated even when neurosurgical approaches are contraindicated. This article aims to provide practical guidance for doctors and nurses initiating and treating patients with apomorphine infusion, and is based on both trial data and clinical experience from movement disorders specialists. A post hoc analysis of data from the TOLEDO randomized clinical trial of apomorphine infusion was conducted along with an analysis of 'real world' experience from 13 movement disorders specialists using a questionnaire that focused on starting patients on apomorphine infusion. Practical guidelines for starting treatment with apomorphine infusion are provided taking into consideration the regional disparities in healthcare. Apomorphine infusion is straightforward to administer but to be successful it requires concordance from the patient and family, and clinical support from an experienced team of doctors and nurses, particularly in the early months of treatment.

Indexed as

ApomorphineParkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsHumansInfusions, ParenteralLevodopaAntiparkinson AgentsApomorphineLevodopaApomorphine infusionClinical practiceParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID37658155
PMCPMC10645621
OpenAlexW4386356818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.