Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658143›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Coronary CT angiography for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation: postmortem proof of concept with histological validation.

David C Rotzinger, Virginie Magnin, Allard C van der Wal, Silke Grabherr, Salah D Qanadli, Katarzyna Michaud

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David C RotzingerDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Imaging, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, Switzerland. david.rotzinger@chuv.ch.
Virginie MagninFaculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Allard C van der WalDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Silke GrabherrFaculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Salah D QanadliFaculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Katarzyna MichaudFaculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine · CHUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic utility of multiphase postmortem CT angiography (PMCTA) to detect plaque enhancement as a surrogate marker of inflammation, using fatal coronary plaques obtained from autopsies following sudden cardiac death.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we included 35 cases (12 women, 34%; median [IQR] age, 52 [11] years), with autopsy-proven coronary thrombosis, histological examination, and multiphase PMCTA. Two radiologists blinded towards histological findings assessed PMCTA for plaque enhancement of the culprit lesion in consensus. Two forensic pathologists determined the culprit lesion and assessed histological samples in consensus. Cases with concomitant vasa vasorum density increase and intraplaque and periadventital inflammation were considered positive for plaque inflammation. Finally, we correlated radiology and pathology findings.

resultsAll 35 cases had histological evidence of atherosclerotic plaque disruption and thrombosis; 30 (85.7%) had plaque inflammation. Plaque enhancement at multiphase PMCTA was reported in 21 (60%) and resulted in a PPV of 95.2% (77.3-99.2%) and an NPV of 28.6% (17-43.9%). Median histological ratings indicated higher intraplaque inflammation (p = .024) and vasa vasorum density (p = .032) in plaques with enhancement. We found no evidence of a difference in adventitial inflammation between CT-negative and CT-positive plaques (p = .211).

conclusionsPlaque enhancement was found in 2/3 of fatal atherothrombotic occlusions at coronary postmortem CT angiography. Furthermore, plaque enhancement correlated with histopathological plaque inflammation and increased vasa vasorum density. Plaque enhancement on multiphase CT angiography could potentially serve as a noninvasive marker of inflammation in high-risk populations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Phenotyping coronary plaque more comprehensively is one of the principal challenges cardiac imaging is facing. Translating our ex vivo findings of CT-based plaque inflammation assessment into clinical studies might help pave the way in defining high-risk plaque better. KEY POINTS: • Most thrombosed coronary plaques leading to fatality in our series had histological signs of inflammation. • Multiphase postmortem CT angiography can provide a noninvasive interrogation of plaque inflammation through contrast enhancement. • Atherosclerotic plaque enhancement at multiphase postmortem CT angiography correlated with histopathological signs of plaque inflammation and could potentially serve as an imaging biological marker of plaque vulnerability.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticAutopsyComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansInflammationMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomography angiographyContrast enhancementCoronary plaquePlaque characterization

Identifiers

PMID37658143
PMCPMC10873449
OpenAlexW4386386592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.