Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658043›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2023

Reducing intrusive memories after trauma via an imagery-competing task intervention in COVID-19 intensive care staff: a randomised controlled trial.

Lalitha Iyadurai, Julie Highfield, Marie Kanstrup, Alfred Markham, Varsha Ramineni, Boliang Guo, Thomas Jaki, Jonathan Kingslake, Guy M Goodwin, Charlotte Summers and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04992390 (A Randomised Optimisation Study of a Brief Digital Imagery-competing Task Intervention to Support NHS ICU Staff Experiencing Intrusive Memories of Traumatic Events From Working in the COVID-19 Pandemic), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04992390 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Optimisation Study of a Brief Digital Imagery-competing Task Intervention to Support NHS ICU Staff Experiencing Intrusive Memories of Traumatic Events From Working in the COVID-19 Pandemic

TypeinterventionalSponsorP1vital Products LimitedRan2021 to 2022Enrolled106ConditionsIntrusive Memories of Traumatic Event(s)ArmsBrief digital imagery-competing task intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lalitha IyaduraiP1vital Products Ltd, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Julie HighfieldIntensive Care Society, 7-9- Breams Buildings, London, UK.
Marie KanstrupDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-5288
Alfred MarkhamP1vital Products Ltd, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Varsha RamineniP1vital Products Ltd, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0330-3184
Boliang GuoNIHR ARC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Thomas JakiMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Jonathan KingslakeP1vital Products Ltd, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1741-1802
Guy M GoodwinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Charlotte SummersHeart and Lung Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-2873
Michael B BonsallDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0250-0423
Emily A HolmesDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden. emily.holmes@psyk.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/14Medical Research Council MR/P502091/1Medical Research Council MR/S035753/1Medical Research Council MR/X005070/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 223016/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrusive memories (IMs) after traumatic events can be distressing and disrupt mental health and functioning. We evaluated the impact of a brief remotely-delivered digital imagery-competing task intervention on the number of IMs for intensive care unit (ICU) staff who faced repeated trauma exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic using a two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind randomised controlled trial, with the comparator arm receiving delayed access to active treatment (crossover). Eligible participants worked clinically in a UK NHS ICU during the pandemic and had at least 3 IMs of work-related traumatic events in the week before recruitment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to immediate (weeks 1-4) or delayed (weeks 5-8) intervention access. Sequential Bayesian analyses to optimise the intervention and increase trial efficiency are reported elsewhere [1]. The primary endpoint for the pre-specified frequentist analysis of the final study population compared the number of IMs experienced in week 4 between the immediate and delayed access arms. Secondary outcomes included clinical symptoms, work functioning and wellbeing. Safety was assessed throughout the trial by scheduled questions and free report. All analyses were undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis (86 randomised participants). There were significantly fewer intrusive memories during week 4 in the immediate (median = 1, IQR = 0-3, n = 43), compared to the comparator delayed arm (median = 10, IQR = 6-17, n = 43), IRR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.20-0.48, p < 0.001. After crossover, the delayed arm also showed a significant reduction in IMs at week 8 compared to week 4. There were convergent findings for symptoms of PTSD, insomnia and anxiety, work engagement and burnout, general functioning and quality of life. The intervention was found safe and acceptable to participants. All adverse events were unrelated to the study. Our study provides the first evidence of a benefit on reducing IMs, improving other clinical symptoms, work functioning and wellbeing, as well as safety of a brief remotely-delivered digital imagery-competing task intervention. An efficacy trial with an active control and longer follow-up is warranted. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04992390).

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBayes TheoremCritical CareHumansQuality of LifeSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID37658043
PMCPMC10474101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.