ArticleGastroenterology2023
Automated Artificial Intelligence Model Trained on a Large Data Set Can Detect Pancreas Cancer on Diagnostic Computed Tomography Scans As Well As Visually Occult Preinvasive Cancer on Prediagnostic Computed Tomography Scans.
Article in Gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in the choice of sperm for ICSI - A Literature Review.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting and Distinguishing Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma via Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning models for pancreatic cancer detection on CT: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of machine learning models for pre-diagnosis and diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in contrast-CT images: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Explainable Machine Learning for Detecting Pancreatic Cancer from Structured Endoscopic Ultrasound Data: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bedside: The Path Toward Real-World Translation for Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Validation of a Pretrained Artificial Intelligence Model for Pancreatic Cancer Detection on Diagnosis and Prediagnosis Computed Tomography Scans.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm with high-resolution computed tomography: impact of the combination of tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Early detection of pancreatic cancer on computed tomography: advancements with deep learning.Radiology advances · 2025Review
- Advancements in Radiomics-Based AI for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Large models in medical imaging: Advances and prospects.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Importance of landscape exploration and progress in molecular therapies and precision medicine for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for detection of pancreatic cancer: a machine learning approach.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- AI-Driven insights in pancreatic cancer imaging: from pre-diagnostic detection to prognostication.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Role of Gut Microbiota and Probiotics in Acute Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsThe aims of our case-control study were (1) to develop an automated 3-dimensional (3D) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) on diagnostic computed tomography scans (CTs), (2) evaluate its generalizability on multi-institutional public data sets, (3) its utility as a potential screening tool using a simulated cohort with high pretest probability, and (4) its ability to detect visually occult preinvasive cancer on prediagnostic CTs.
methodsA 3D-CNN classification system was trained using algorithmically generated bounding boxes and pancreatic masks on a curated data set of 696 portal phase diagnostic CTs with PDA and 1080 control images with a nonneoplastic pancreas. The model was evaluated on (1) an intramural hold-out test subset (409 CTs with PDA, 829 controls); (2) a simulated cohort with a case-control distribution that matched the risk of PDA in glycemically defined new-onset diabetes, and Enriching New-Onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer score ≥3; (3) multi-institutional public data sets (194 CTs with PDA, 80 controls), and (4) a cohort of 100 prediagnostic CTs (i.e., CTs incidentally acquired 3-36 months before clinical diagnosis of PDA) without a focal mass, and 134 controls.
resultsOf the CTs in the intramural test subset, 798 (64%) were from other hospitals. The model correctly classified 360 CTs (88%) with PDA and 783 control CTs (94%), with a mean accuracy 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91-0.94), area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98), sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91), and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96). Activation areas on heat maps overlapped with the tumor in 350 of 360 CTs (97%). Performance was high across tumor stages (sensitivity of 0.80, 0.87, 0.95, and 1.0 on T1 through T4 stages, respectively), comparable for hypodense vs isodense tumors (sensitivity: 0.90 vs 0.82), different age, sex, CT slice thicknesses, and vendors (all P > .05), and generalizable on both the simulated cohort (accuracy, 0.95 [95% 0.94-0.95]; AUROC curve, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-0.99]) and public data sets (accuracy, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.90]; AUROC curve, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95]). Despite being exclusively trained on diagnostic CTs with larger tumors, the model could detect occult PDA on prediagnostic CTs (accuracy, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.79-0.88]; AUROC curve, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]; sensitivity, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.67-0.84]; and specificity, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95]) at a median 475 days (range, 93-1082 days) before clinical diagnosis.
conclusionsThis automated artificial intelligence model trained on a large and diverse data set shows high accuracy and generalizable performance for detection of PDA on diagnostic CTs as well as for visually occult PDA on prediagnostic CTs. Prospective validation with blood-based biomarkers is warranted to assess the potential for early detection of sporadic PDA in high-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.