ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
A new method for trans-vaginal extraction of an impacted vaginal calculus: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant vaginal lithiasis in spinal cord injury related neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: diagnostic pitfall with upper urinary tract deterioration.Spinal cord series and cases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVaginal stones are a rare pathology, with no clear guidelines on management and optimal removal techniques. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a novel surgical technique, leading to safe transvaginal extraction of the largest reported impacted vaginal stone. In this case we removed an 11 cm struvite stone transvaginally from a 46 year old patient. This was achieved by hollowing it out with surgical drills, allowing safe collapse of the outer cortex and complete removal. DISCUSSION: Our technique allowed for the safe, minimally invasive removal of the largest stone to be reported so far in the literature, preventing further complications for the patient. A full description of our technique is outlined to allow other clinicians utilisation of this for similar cases in the future.
conclusionFuture vaginal calculi could be managed using this technique, preventing the need for laparotomy or vaginal trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.