Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37657281›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2023

Clinical characterization and differentiation of B-SNIP psychosis Biotypes: Algorithmic Diagnostics for Efficient Prescription of Treatments (ADEPT)-1.

Brett A Clementz, Ishanu Chattopadhyay, Rebekah L Trotti, David A Parker, Elliot S Gershon, S Kristian Hill, Elena I Ivleva, Sarah K Keedy, Matcheri S Keshavan, Jennifer E McDowell and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unraveling the Neural Landscape of Mental Disorders Using Double Functional Independent Primitives.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brett A ClementzDepartment of Psychology, BioImaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States of America. Electronic address: clementz@uga.edu.
Ishanu ChattopadhyayDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Rebekah L TrottiDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
David A ParkerDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Elliot S GershonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
S Kristian HillDepartment of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Elena I IvlevaDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Sarah K KeedyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Matcheri S KeshavanDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Jennifer E McDowellDepartment of Psychology, Owens Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States of America.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America; Olin NeuroPsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, United States of America.
Carol A TammingaDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Robert D GibbonsCenter for Health Statistics, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
J: NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002382 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Vasiliki Michopoulos · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
5/5: Selective Antipsychotic Response to Clozapine in B-SNIP Biotype-1 (CLOZAPINE)R01MH124803 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CLEMENTZ, BRETT A · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
2/2 B-SNIP: Algorithmic Diagnostics for Efficient Prescription of Treatments (ADEPT) - Resubmission - 1R01MH124805 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIBBONS, ROBERT D · 2021 to 2021
$328k
1/2: B-SNIP: Algorithmic Diagnostics for Efficient Prescription of Treatments (ADEPT)R01MH124806 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CLEMENTZ, BRETT A · 2021 to 2021
$302k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002382NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124803NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124805NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinically defined psychosis diagnoses are neurobiologically heterogeneous. The B-SNIP consortium identified and validated more neurobiologically homogeneous psychosis Biotypes using an extensive battery of neurocognitive and psychophysiological laboratory measures. However, typically the first step in any diagnostic evaluation is the clinical interview. In this project, we evaluated if psychosis Biotypes have clinical characteristics that can support their differentiation in addition to obtaining laboratory testing. Clinical interview data from 1907 individuals with a psychosis Biotype were used to create a diagnostic algorithm. The features were 58 ratings from standard clinical scales. Extremely randomized tree algorithms were used to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, and overall classification success. Biotype classification accuracy peaked at 91 % with the use of 57 items on average. A reduced feature set of 28 items, though, also showed 81 % classification accuracy. Using this reduced item set, we found that only 10-11 items achieved a one-vs-all (Biotype-1 or not, Biotype-2 or not, Biotype-3 or not) area under the sensitivity-specificity curve of .78 to .81. The top clinical characteristics for differentiating psychosis Biotypes, in order of importance, were (i) difficulty in abstract thinking, (ii) multiple indicators of social functioning, (iii) conceptual disorganization, (iv) severity of hallucinations, (v) stereotyped thinking, (vi) suspiciousness, (vii) unusual thought content, (viii) lack of spontaneous speech, and (ix) severity of delusions. These features were remarkably different from those that differentiated DSM psychosis diagnoses. This low-burden adaptive algorithm achieved reasonable classification accuracy and will support Biotype-specific etiological and treatment investigations even in under-resourced clinical and research environments.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersCognitionHallucinationsHumansThinking

Identifiers

PMID37657281
PMCPMC10712427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.