Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37657234›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023

Towards Reduced Order Models via Robust Proper Orthogonal Decomposition to capture personalised aortic haemodynamics.

Chotirawee Chatpattanasiri, Gaia Franzetti, Mirko Bonfanti, Vanessa Diaz-Zuccarini, Stavroula Balabani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chotirawee ChatpattanasiriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Gaia FranzettiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Mirko BonfantiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Vanessa Diaz-ZuccariniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Stavroula BalabaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: s.balabani@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/22/31356British Heart Foundation NH/20/1/34705Wellcome Trust 203145Wellcome Trust 203145Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data driven, reduced order modelling has shown promise in tackling the challenges associated with computational and experimental haemodynamic models. In this work, we focus on the use of Reduced Order Models (ROMs) to reconstruct velocity fields in a patient-specific dissected aorta, with the objective being to compare the ROMs obtained from Robust Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (RPOD) to those obtained from the traditional Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD). POD and RPOD are applied to in vitro, haemodynamic data acquired by Particle Image Velocimetry and compare the decomposed flows to those derived from Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) data for the same geometry and flow conditions. In this work, PIV and CFD results act as surrogates for clinical haemodynamic data e.g. MR, helping to demonstrate the potential use of ROMS in real clinical scenarios. The flow is reconstructed using different numbers of POD modes and the flow features obtained throughout the cardiac cycle are compared to the original Full Order Models (FOMs). Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA), the first step of RPOD, has been found to enhance the quality of PIV data, allowing POD to capture most of the kinetic energy of the flow in just two modes similar to the numerical data that are free from measurement noise. The reconstruction errors differ along the cardiac cycle with diastolic flows requiring more modes for accurate reconstruction. In general, modes 1-10 are found sufficient to represent the flow field. The results demonstrate that the coherent structures that characterise this aortic dissection flow are described by the first few POD modes suggesting that it is possible to represent the macroscale behaviour of aortic flow in a low-dimensional space; thus significantly simplifying the problem, and allowing for more computationally efficient flow simulations or machine learning based flow predictions that can pave the way for translation of such models to the clinic.

Indexed as

AortaAortic DissectionHeartHemodynamicsHumansHydrodynamicsAortic haemodynamicsComputational fluid dynamicsParticle image velocimetryPatient-specific modellingProper orthogonal decompositionReduced Order ModelRobust principle component analysis

Identifiers

PMID37657234
PMCPMC7615718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.