Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37657151›Full record

ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2023

HACA3: A unified approach for multi-site MR image harmonization.

Lianrui Zuo, Yihao Liu, Yuan Xue, Blake E Dewey, Samuel W Remedios, Savannah P Hays, Murat Bilgel, Ellen M Mowry, Scott D Newsome, Peter A Calabresi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotype discovery of traumatic brain injury segmentations from heterogeneous multi-site data.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lianrui ZuoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Electronic address: lr_zuo@jhu.edu.
Yihao LiuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Yuan XueDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Blake E DeweyDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Samuel W RemediosDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Savannah P HaysDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Murat BilgelLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Ellen M MowryDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Scott D NewsomeDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Peter A CalabresiDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Susan M ResnickLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Jerry L PrinceDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Aaron CarassDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARILYN S. ALBERT · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
Imaging Neurodegeneration in Multiple SclerosisR01NS082347 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PETER A CALABRESI, Shiv Saidha · 2013 to 2026
$7.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of standardization and consistency of acquisition is a prominent issue in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. This often causes undesired contrast variations in the acquired images due to differences in hardware and acquisition parameters. In recent years, image synthesis-based MR harmonization with disentanglement has been proposed to compensate for the undesired contrast variations. The general idea is to disentangle anatomy and contrast information from MR images to achieve cross-site harmonization. Despite the success of existing methods, we argue that major improvements can be made from three aspects. First, most existing methods are built upon the assumption that multi-contrast MR images of the same subject share the same anatomy. This assumption is questionable, since different MR contrasts are specialized to highlight different anatomical features. Second, these methods often require a fixed set of MR contrasts for training (e.g., both T1-weighted and T2-weighted images), limiting their applicability. Lastly, existing methods are generally sensitive to imaging artifacts. In this paper, we present Harmonization with Attention-based Contrast, Anatomy, and Artifact Awareness (HACA3), a novel approach to address these three issues. HACA3 incorporates an anatomy fusion module that accounts for the inherent anatomical differences between MR contrasts. Furthermore, HACA3 can be trained and applied to any combination of MR contrasts and is robust to imaging artifacts. HACA3 is developed and evaluated on diverse MR datasets acquired from 21 sites with varying field strengths, scanner platforms, and acquisition protocols. Experiments show that HACA3 achieves state-of-the-art harmonization performance under multiple image quality metrics. We also demonstrate the versatility and potential clinical impact of HACA3 on downstream tasks including white matter lesion segmentation for people with multiple sclerosis and longitudinal volumetric analyses for normal aging subjects. Code is available at https://github.com/lianruizuo/haca3.

Indexed as

BrainWhite MatterAgingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAttentionContrastive learningDisentanglementHarmonizationMRIStandardizationSynthesis

Identifiers

PMID37657151
PMCPMC10592042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.