Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37656809›Full record

ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2023

Rational design of small-molecule responsive protein switches.

Sailan Shui, Stephen Buckley, Leo Scheller, Bruno E Correia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rational design of small-molecule responsive protein switches.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sailan ShuiLaboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering (LPDI), STI, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stephen BuckleyLaboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering (LPDI), STI, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-9363
Leo SchellerLaboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering (LPDI), STI, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-4015
Bruno E CorreiaLaboratory of Protein Design and Immunoengineering (LPDI), STI, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-8636

Funding

European Research Council 716058Swiss National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small-molecule responsive protein switches are powerful tools for controlling cellular processes. These switches are designed to respond rapidly and specifically to their inducer. They have been used in numerous applications, including the regulation of gene expression, post-translational protein modification, and signal transduction. Typically, small-molecule responsive protein switches consist of two proteins that interact with each other in the presence or absence of a small molecule. Recent advances in computational protein design already contributed to the development of protein switches with an expanded range of small-molecule inducers and increasingly sophisticated switch mechanisms. Further progress in the engineering of small-molecule responsive switches is fueled by cutting-edge computational design approaches, which will enable more complex and precise control over cellular processes and advance synthetic biology applications in biotechnology and medicine. Here, we discuss recent milestones and how technological advances are impacting the development of chemical switches.

Indexed as

ProteinsSignal TransductionProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSynthetic BiologyProteinscomputational protein designprotein-ligand interactionsprotein-protein interactionsprotein switchessmall moleculesynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID37656809
PMCPMC10510469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.