Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37656496›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Utility of Smartphone-Based Digital Phenotyping Biomarkers in Assessing Treatment Response to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Radhika Suneel Kelkar, Danielle Currey, Srilakshmi Nagendra, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Vanteemar S Sreeraj, John Torous, Jagadisha Thirthalli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Radhika Suneel Kelkar *National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-9912
Danielle Currey *Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-2290
Srilakshmi NagendraNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-5270
Urvakhsh Meherwan MehtaNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2252-9189
Vanteemar S SreerajNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-1228
John TorousBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-7937
Jagadisha ThirthalliNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3998-9672
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying biomarkers of response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in treatment-resistant depression is a priority for personalizing care. Clinical and neurobiological determinants of treatment response to TMS, while promising, have limited scalability. Therefore, evaluating novel, technologically driven, and potentially scalable biomarkers, such as digital phenotyping, is necessary.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the potential of smartphone-based digital phenotyping and its feasibility as a predictive biomarker of treatment response to TMS in depression.

methodsWe assessed the feasibility of digital phenotyping by examining the adherence and retention rates. We used smartphone data from passive sensors as well as active symptom surveys to determine treatment response in a naturalistic course of TMS treatment for treatment-resistant depression. We applied a scikit-learn logistic regression model (l1 ratio=0.5; 2-fold cross-validation) using both active and passive data. We analyzed related variance metrics throughout the entire treatment duration and on a weekly basis to predict responders and nonresponders to TMS, defined as ≥50% reduction in clinician-rated symptom severity from baseline.

resultsThe adherence rate was 89.47%, and the retention rate was 73%. The area under the curve for correct classification of TMS response ranged from 0.59 (passive data alone) to 0.911 (both passive and active data) for data collected throughout the treatment course. Importantly, a model using the average of all features (passive and active) for the first week had an area under the curve of 0.7375 in predicting responder status at the end of the treatment.

conclusionsThe results of our study suggest that it is feasible to use digital phenotyping data to assess response to TMS in depression. Early changes in digital phenotyping biomarkers, such as predicting response from the first week of data, as shown in our results, may also help guide the treatment course.

Indexed as

depressiondigital phenotypingmobile phoneoutcomepredictive biomarkersmartphonetheta burst stimulationTMStranscranial magnetic stimulationtreatment response

Identifiers

PMID37656496
PMCPMC10504622
OpenAlexW4385280720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.