ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Pharmacokinetics of Orbital Topotecan After Ophthalmic Artery Chemosurgery and Intravenous Infusion in the Swine Model.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Turkish Retinoblastoma Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (1966-2024).Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- A pilot pharmacokinetic and Metabolite identification study of Erinacine A in a Single landrace pig model.Heliyon · 2024Article
- MR Imaging of Adverse Effects and Ocular Growth Decline after Selective Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Surgery, multiagent systemic chemotherapy, and radiation are used for patients with orbital retinoblastoma but are associated with unacceptable short- and long-term toxicity (including death). We studied orbital and systemic exposure of topotecan in the swine model after ophthalmic artery chemosurgery (OAC) and intravenous (IV) delivery. Methods: Landrace pigs (n = 3) underwent 30-minute OAC of topotecan (4 mg), and samples were serially obtained from the femoral artery and from a microdialysis probe inserted into the lateral rectus muscle sheath of the infused eye as a surrogate of the orbital irrigation. Animals were recovered, and, after a wash-out period, plasma and microdialysate samples from the contralateral eye were collected after a 30-minute IV infusion of topotecan (4 mg). Samples were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using MonolixSuite. Results: After OAC, median topotecan exposure in the orbit was 5624 ng × h/mL (range 3922-12531) compared to 23 ng × h/mL (range 18-75) after IV infusion. Thus, topotecan exposure in the orbit was 218-fold (range 75-540) higher after OAC than after IV infusion despite comparable systemic exposure (AUCpl) between routes (AUCpl, OAC: 141 ng × h/mL [127-191] versus AUCpl, IV: 139 ng × h/mL [126-186]). OAC was more selective to target the orbit because the median (range) orbital-to-plasma exposure ratio was 44 (28-65) after OAC compared to 0.18 (0.13-0.40) after IV infusion. Conclusions: OAC of topotecan resulted in higher orbital exposure than after IV infusion and was a more selective route for local drug delivery. Patients with orbital retinoblastoma may benefit from a multimodal treatment strategy including OAC therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.