Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37656340›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2023

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia.

Ge Tian, Tong Chen, Xin Liu, Yue Lin, Na Li, Hua Gao, Mingna Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ge TianEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Tong ChenEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Xin LiuEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Yue LinEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Na LiEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Hua GaoEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Mingna LiuEye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Eye Hospital), Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, 372 Jingsi Road, Jinan, 250021, China. lmn_2422@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-1725
Shandong Eye Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870639Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2020MH171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This was a retrospective case series study. Patients who had completed 1-year follow-up after receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, or LASEK at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021 were included. Pentacam pachymetry was performed to measure the CCT. The predicted CCT reduction was obtained through laser platform. The measured CCT reduction was defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative CCT using Pentacam pachymetry. There were 100 eyes treated by SMILE, 100 eyes by FS-LASIK, and 100 eyes by LASEK. There was a significant difference in predicted CCT reduction among the three surgeries (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in measured CCT reduction postoperatively (P

Indexed as

Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-AssistedKeratomileusis, Laser In SituMyopiaSurgical WoundEyeHumansRetrospective StudiesCorneal thicknessFemtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusisLaser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusisRefractive surgerySmall incision lenticule extraction

Identifiers

PMID37656340
OpenAlexW4386346799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.