Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37656318›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2023

Overlap and Differences in Migraine and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Sweta Sengupta, Jaskiran Vidwan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sweta SenguptaDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, 932 Morreene Road, Durham, 27705, NC, UK. sweta.sengupta@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-4128
Jaskiran VidwanDepartment of Neurology, Duke University, 932 Morreene Road, Durham, 27705, NC, UK.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMigraine and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) are increasingly encountered but remain enigmatic. This review compares the similarities and differences of the diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, and risk factors for chronic migraine and IIH. RECENT

findingsWhile migraine and IIH are distinct diseases, both conditions are frequently found concurrently and may share a link. Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in those with or without pre-existing migraine may present with migraine-like headaches and contribute to migraine chronification. Increased intracranial pressure may be a coincidental occurrence in patients with migraine and normalization of pressure does not always translate to headache improvement. Limited information is available regarding the standard of treatment for patients with chronic migraine and IIH without papilledema. There continues to be controversy over the normal range of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) values. Recognizing the concurrence of both conditions advances our understanding of headache pathology and demonstrates a striking need for more research.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypertensionMigraine DisordersPapilledemaPseudotumor CerebriHeadacheHumans“Chronic migraine,“Idiopathic intracranial hypertension,“Idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledemaMigraine

Identifiers

PMID37656318
OpenAlexW4386347597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.