Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37656308›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of behavioral medicine2024

Increased Knowledge Mediates the Effect of Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention on Diffusion of Cervical Cancer Screening Advocacy Among Social Network Members in a Pilot Trial.

Ishita Ghai, Glenn J Wagner, Joseph K B Matovu, Margrethe Juncker, Eve Namisango, Kathryn Bouskill, Sylvia Nakami, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Emmanuel Luyirika, Rhoda K Wanyenze

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04960748 (Pilot of a Network-driven, Advocacy Intervention to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04960748 phase2completednot on this map

Pilot of a Network-driven, Advocacy Intervention to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2021 to 2022Enrolled143ConditionsCervical Cancer PreventionArmsWOMEN FIGHTING TO STOP CERVICAL CANCER
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ishita GhaiFrederick S. Pardee RAND Graduate School, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. ighai@pardeerand.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3052-721X
Glenn J WagnerRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Joseph K B MatovuSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Margrethe JunckerRays of Hope Hospice Jinja, Jinja, Uganda.
Eve NamisangoAfrican Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Kathryn BouskillRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Sylvia NakamiRays of Hope Hospice Jinja, Jinja, Uganda.
Jolly Beyeza-KashesyaMulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Emmanuel LuyirikaAfrican Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.
Rhoda K WanyenzeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
RAND Corporation · USAfrican Palliative Care Association · UGJinja Hospital · UGBusitema University · UGMakerere University · UGMulago Hospital · UG

Funding

Pilot of a network-driven, advocacy intervention to promote cervical cancer screening in UgandaR21TW011728 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANYENZE, RHODA KITTI · 2020 to 2021
$396k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW011728FIC NIH HHS R21TW011728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGame Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP), a peer-led, group advocacy training intervention, increased cervical cancer (CC) prevention advocacy not only among intervention recipients, but also their social network members (referred to as "alters") who were targeted with advocacy in a pilot randomized controlled trial. We examined mediators and moderators of this effect on alter advocacy, to understand how and for whom the intervention had such an effect.

methodForty women (index participants) who had recently screened for CC enrolled and were randomly assigned to receive the GC-CCP intervention (n = 20) or the wait-list control (n = 20). Up to three alters from each participant (n = 103) were surveyed at baseline and month 6. Measures of CC-related cognitive constructs (knowledge, enacted stigma, and risk management self-efficacy), as well as extent of advocacy received from index participants, were assessed as mediators of the intervention effect on alter advocacy using multivariate regression analyses. Alter characteristics were examined as moderators.

resultsIncreased CC-related knowledge partially mediated the intervention effect on increased alter engagement in CC prevention advocacy; those with greater gains in knowledge reported greater engagement in advocacy. No moderators of the intervention effect were identified.

conclusionThe effect of GC-CCP on alter CC prevention advocacy is enhanced by increased alter knowledge pertaining to CC prevention, causes, and treatment and suggests this may be key for diffusion of intervention effects on increased CC prevention advocacy throughout a social network.

trial registrationNCT04960748 (registered on clinicaltrials.gov , 7/14/2021).

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPeer GroupPilot ProjectsSelf EfficacySocial NetworkingSocial SupportCervical cancerInterventionMediationPeer advocacyPreventionRandomized controlled trialSocial diffusionSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID37656308
PMCPMC10904666
OpenAlexW4386346572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.