ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2023
Comparative bacteriome and antibiotic resistome analysis of water and sediment of the Ganga River of India.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and application of a highly sensitive quadruple droplet digital PCR method for simultaneous quantification of sulfonamide resistance genes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Microbiome Landscape: A Metagenomic Study of Bacterial Diversity, Antibiotic Resistance, and Virulence Factors in the Sediments of the River Ganga, India.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comparative analysis between water and sediment can provide better information to understand the dynamics of the inhabitant microbiome and their respective antibiotic resistance genes of a river. Therefore, the present investigation was carried to explore the limited information available on bacterial microbiome and their predictive antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from water and sediment of the Ganga River. The study utilized the NGS-based sequences previously submitted under the accession number (PRJNA847424 and PRJNA892876). Overall analysis revealed that twenty phyla and fifty-four genera were shared between the water and sediment of the Ganga River. Of them, nine phyla and nineteen genera were observed as significantly different (p-value < 0.05). Where the majority of the genera were associated with the sediment samples over the water that identify the sediment samples as more diverse for species richness. Similarly, seventy-six ARGs were shared between water and sediment samples. Of the ten abundant antibiotic resistance pathways, seven were relatively abundant in sediment samples as compared to the water. Vancomycin resistance genes were significantly more abundant among sediment samples, whereas β-lactam resistance genes were equally distributed in water and sediment samples. The network analysis further revealed that five genera (Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Candidatus_divison CL5003, and Candidatus_division SWB02) showed a significantly positive correlation with six antibiotic resistance pathways (β-lactam, vancomycin, multidrug resistance, tetracycline, aminoglycoside, and macrolide resistance pathways). The study comes out with several findings where sediment may be considered as a more atrocious habitat for evolving the resistance mechanisms against threatful antibiotics over the water samples of the Ganga River.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37656255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.