Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655850›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2024

Holistically sustainable continence care: A working definition, the case of single-used absorbent hygiene products (AHPs) and the need for ecosystems thinking.

Tiina Vaittinen, Krista Koljonen, Susanna Tella, Eveliina Asikainen, Katri Laatikainen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tiina VaittinenFaculty of Management and Business (Politics Unit) and Faculty of Social Sciences (Global Health and Development), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8349-1487
Krista KoljonenSchool of Engineering Science, Department of Separation Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lappeenranta, Finland.
Susanna TellaFaculty of Social and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland.
Eveliina AsikainenPedagogical Innovations and Culture, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Katri LaatikainenSchool of Engineering Science, Department of Separation Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lappeenranta, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incontinence is a common health issue that affects hundreds of millions of people across the world. The solution is often to manage the condition with different kinds of single-use continence technologies, such as incontinence pads and other absorbent hygiene products (AHPs). Throughout their life cycle, these fossil-based products form a remarkable yet inadequately addressed ecological burden in society, contributing to global warming and other environmental degradation. The products are a necessity for their users' wellbeing. When looking for sustainability transitions in this field, focus on individual consumer-choice is thus inadequate - and unfair to the users. The industry is already seeking to decrease its carbon footprint. Yet, to tackle the environmental impact of single-use continence products, also societies and health systems at large must start taking continence seriously. Arguing that continence-aware societies are more sustainable societies, we devise in this article a society-wide working definition for holistically sustainable continence care. Involving dimensions of social, ecological and economic sustainability, the concept draws attention to the wide range of technologies, infrastructures and care practices that emerge around populations' continence needs. Holistically sustainable continence care is thus not only about AHPs. However, in this article, we examine holistically sustainable continence care through the case of AHPs. We review what is known about the environmental impact AHPs, discuss the impact of care practices on aggregate material usage, the future of biobased and degradable incontinence pads, as well as questions of waste management and circular economy. The case of AHPs shows how holistically sustainable continence care is a wider question than technological product development. In the end of the article, we envision an ecosystem where technologies, infrastructures and practices of holistically sustainable continence care can flourish, beyond the focus on singular technologies.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceAbsorbent PadsFecal IncontinenceHumansIncontinence PadsecosystemsHolistically sustainable continence careincontinenceincontinence padssingle-use absorbent hygiene products (AHPs)sustainability transitions

Identifiers

PMID37655850
PMCPMC11318206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.