Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655833›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2023

Long-term outcomes after responsive neurostimulation for treatment of refractory epilepsy: a single-center experience of 100 cases.

Jorge A Roa, Lara Marcuse, Madeline Fields, Maite La Vega-Talbott, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Steven M Wolf, Patricia McGoldrick, Saadi Ghatan, Fedor Panov

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Responsive neurostimulation in children, adolescents, and young Adults-Longitudinal effectiveness and safety.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cenobamate for Difficult-to-Treat Epilepsy - Selected Case Vignettes.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jorge A RoaDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Lara Marcuse2Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York; and.
Madeline Fields2Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York; and.
Maite La Vega-Talbott2Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York; and.
Ji Yeoun Yoo2Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York; and.
Steven M Wolf3Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Health Physicians, New York Medical College, New York, New York.
Patricia McGoldrick3Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Health Physicians, New York Medical College, New York, New York.
Saadi GhatanDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Fedor PanovDepartments of1Neurosurgery and.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USBoston Children's Health Physicians · USNew York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite antiepileptic drugs, more than 30% of people with epilepsy continue to have seizures. Patients with such drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) may undergo invasive treatment such as resection, laser ablation of the epileptogenic focus, or vagus nerve stimulation, but many are not candidates for epilepsy surgery or fail to respond to such interventions. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) provides a neuromodulatory option. In this study, the authors present a single-center experience with the use of RNS over the last 5 years to provide long-term control of seizures in patients with DRE with at least 1 year of follow-up.

methodsThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected single-center database of consecutive DRE patients who underwent RNS system implantation from September 2015 to December 2020. Patients were followed-up postoperatively to evaluate seizure freedom and complications.

resultsOne hundred patients underwent RNS placement. Seven patients developed infections: 2 responded to intravenous antibiotic therapy, 3 required partial removal and salvaging of the system, and 2 required complete removal of the RNS device. No postoperative tract hemorrhages, strokes, device migrations, or malfunctions were documented in this cohort. The average follow-up period was 26.3 months (range 1-5.2 years). In terms of seizure reduction, 8 patients had 0%-24% improvement, 14 had 25%-49% improvement, 29 experienced 50%-74% improvement, 30 had 75%-99% improvement, and 19 achieved seizure freedom. RNS showed significantly better outcomes over time: patients with more than 3 years of RNS therapy had 1.8 higher odds of achieving 75% or more seizure reduction (95% CI 1.07-3.09, p = 0.02). Also, patients who had undergone resective or ablative surgery prior to RNS implantation had 8.25 higher odds of experiencing 50% or more seizure reduction (95% CI 1.05-65.1, p = 0.04).

conclusionsResponsive neurostimulator implantation achieved 50% or more seizure reduction in approximately 80% of patients. Even in patients who did not achieve seizure freedom, significant improvement in seizure duration, severity, or postictal state was reported in more than 68% of cases. Infection (7%) was the most common complication. Patients with prior resective or ablative procedures and those who had been treated with RNS for more than 3 years achieved better outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyHumansRetrospective StudiesSeizuresTreatment Outcomecomplicationsepilepsyoutcomepredictorrefractoryresponsive neurostimulation

Identifiers

PMID37655833
OpenAlexW4362473519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.