Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655823›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Machine Learning-Boosted Docking Enables the Efficient Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Giga-Scale Enumerated Chemical Libraries.

Toni Sivula, Laxman Yetukuri, Tuomo Kalliokoski, Heikki Käsnänen, Antti Poso, Ina Pöhner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Identification of nanomolar adenosine ANature communications · 2025
    Article
  17. A Database for Large-Scale Docking and Experimental Results.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Toni SivulaSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio FI-70211, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-6189
Laxman YetukuriCSC─IT Center for Science Ltd., Espoo FI-02101, Finland.
Tuomo KalliokoskiComputational Medicine Design, Orion Pharma, Orionintie 1A, Espoo FI-02101, Finland.
Heikki KäsnänenComputational Medicine Design, Orion Pharma, Orionintie 1A, Espoo FI-02101, Finland.
Antti PosoSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio FI-70211, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4196-4204
Ina PöhnerSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio FI-70211, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2801-8902
University of Eastern Finland · FIOrion Corporation (Finland) · FICSC - IT Center for Science (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of ultra-large screening libraries, filled to the brim with billions of readily available compounds, poses a growing challenge for docking-based virtual screening. Machine learning (ML)-boosted strategies like the tool HASTEN combine rapid ML prediction with the brute-force docking of small fractions of such libraries to increase screening throughput and take on giga-scale libraries. In our case study of an anti-bacterial chaperone and an anti-viral kinase, we first generated a brute-force docking baseline for 1.56 billion compounds in the Enamine REAL lead-like library with the fast Glide high-throughput virtual screening protocol. With HASTEN, we observed robust recall of 90% of the true 1000 top-scoring virtual hits in both targets when docking only 1% of the entire library. This reduction of the required docking experiments by 99% significantly shortens the screening time. In the kinase target, the employment of a hydrogen bonding constraint resulted in a major proportion of unsuccessful docking attempts and hampered ML predictions. We demonstrate the optimization potential in the treatment of failed compounds when performing ML-boosted screening and benchmark and showcase HASTEN as a fast and robust tool in a growing arsenal of approaches to unlock the chemical space covered by giga-scale screening libraries for everyday drug discovery campaigns.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysSmall Molecule LibrariesAntiviral AgentsMachine LearningAntiviral AgentsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID37655823
PMCPMC10523430
OpenAlexW4386346641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.