ArticleACS applied bio materials2023
Correlative Imaging of Three-Dimensional Cell Culture on Opaque Bioscaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Graphene and TiACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- Direct Scaffold-Coupled Electrical Stimulation of Chondrogenic Progenitor Cells through Graphene Foam Bioscaffolds to Control the Mechanical Properties of Graphene Foam-Cell Composites.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Multiparametric physicochemical analysis of a type 1 collagen 3D cell culture model using light and electron microscopy and mass spectrometry imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Formulation and Aerosol Jet Printing of Nickel Nanoparticle Ink for High-Temperature Microelectronic Applications and Patterned Graphene Growth.ACS applied electronic materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) tissue engineering (TE) is a prospective treatment that can be used to restore or replace damaged musculoskeletal tissues, such as articular cartilage. However, current challenges in TE include identifying materials that are biocompatible and have properties that closely match the mechanical properties and cellular microenvironment of the target tissue. Visualization and analysis of potential 3D porous scaffolds as well as the associated cell growth and proliferation characteristics present additional problems. This is particularly challenging for opaque scaffolds using standard optical imaging techniques. Here, we use graphene foam (GF) as a 3D porous biocompatible substrate, which is scalable, reproducible, and a suitable environment for ATDC5 cell growth and chondrogenic differentiation. ATDC5 cells are cultured, maintained, and stained with a combination of fluorophores and gold nanoparticles to enable correlative microscopic characterization techniques, which elucidate the effect of GF properties on cell behavior in a 3D environment. Most importantly, the staining protocol allows for direct imaging of cell growth and proliferation on opaque scaffolds using X-ray MicroCT, including imaging growth of cells within the hollow GF branches, which is not possible with standard fluorescence and electron microscopy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.