ArticleAging & mental health
'There's no straight line…' a consumer-informed intervention for FTD family care partners: the STELLA-FTD pilot study.
Article in Aging & mental health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Support Via Technology: Living and Learning With Advancing FTD
STELLA-FTD: Examination of a Behavior Change Intervention for FTD Family Care Partners
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- STELLA-FTD: Examination of a Behavior Change Intervention for Frontotemporal Dementia Family Care Partners.Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBehavioral symptoms and communication challenges are particularly apparent in frontotemporal degenerative (FTD) dementias. There is a paucity of psychoeducation programming specifically tailored to the needs of families with FTD. We revised an existing intervention to meet the needs of these families.
methodsWe used a quasi-experimental approach. In Phase 1, we sought consumer input about an existing intervention. In Phase 2, we modified the intervention based on the qualitative findings from Phase 1 and tested the revised intervention (STELLA-FTD) for feasibility, acceptability and early-stage efficacy. Outcome for Phase 2 included feasibility data and care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors. Secondary outcomes included data from unobtrusive sleep monitoring. An inductive analysis of transcripts from the Phase 2 STELLA-FTD focus group provides guidance for future revisions.
resultsFifteen family care partners participated in the Phase 1 focus groups; sixteen care partners enrolled in Phase 2. Testing in Phase 2 revealed that the care partners found our consumer-informed revised intervention both feasible and acceptable. The post-intervention findings suggest STELLA-FTD has the potential to reduce care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors and to decrease care partner burden. Sleep did not change over the 8-week intervention.
conclusionsThe revised STELLA-FTD intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable, and has potential to improve care partner burden for families living with FTD. Providing the intervention
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.