Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655432›Full record

ArticleCancer research2023

Using Machine Learning to Predict TP53 Mutation Status and Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer from Routine Histology Images.

François Bordeleau

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

François BordeleauOncology Division, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5114-1757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite years of progress, we still lack reliable tools to predict the aggressiveness of tumors, including in the case of prostate cancer. Biomarkers have been developed, but they often suffer from poor accuracy if used alone due to tumor heterogeneity. Nevertheless, some mutations, notably TP53 mutations, are highly correlated with progression. In their work in this issue of Cancer Research, Pizurica and colleagues implemented a machine learning-based model applied to routine histology and trained with prior information on TP53 mutation status. Their model output provides a quantitative prediction of TP53 mutation status while having a strong correlation with aggressiveness, showing promise as a prognostic in silico biomarker. See related article by Pizurica et al., p. 2970.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Disease-Free SurvivalHumansMaleMutationPhenotypePrognosisTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.