Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655288›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Influenza vaccine uptake in Tunisia from two high-risk groups' perception and attitudes: a qualitative study.

Aicha Boukthir, Hind Bouguerra, Afif Ben Salah, Astrid C Erber, Sana Chaabene, Hayet Moussa, François Guillemette, Nissaf Ben Alaya, Jihene Bettaieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aicha BoukthirDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hind BouguerraObservatoire National des Maladies Nouvelles et Emergentes, Tunis, Tunisia.
Afif Ben SalahDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Astrid C ErberDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sana ChaabeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hayet MoussaDépartement de Sociologie et d'Anthropologie, Institut Supérieur des Sciences Humaines de Tunis, Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
François GuillemetteDépartement des Sciences de l'Education, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Enseignement Supérieur (LIRES), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, QC, Canada.
Nissaf Ben AlayaObservatoire National des Maladies Nouvelles et Emergentes, Tunis, Tunisia.
Jihene BettaiebDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women (PW) and older adult with chronic diseases (ECD) are priority groups for the influenza vaccination. This study was designed to have a better insight into the influenza perceptions and barriers of the vaccine uptake from these groups' perspectives. Methods: This qualitative study consisted of 20 focus group discussions (FGDs) enrolled from five governorates across the country (north, center, and south) between March 18 and July 10, 2019, in urban and rural areas. FGDs were conducted in Arabic (Tunisian dialect) and following the topic guide. Data were transcribed in the local language then translated into English and analyzed using Nvivo12 Software. This permitted the analysis thematic approach, using codes determined by the focus groups. Results: A total of 170 individuals participated in the FGDs (84 ECD and 86 PW). Both groups recognized the weakness of the immune system as key determinant for severity. While PW raised the lack of information about the vaccine, the ECD emphasized accessibility problems. Five main barriers to influenza vaccination were identified: cultural barriers and use of traditional medicine, misleading or lack of information about influenza and the vaccine, advice against its uptake, problems of availability and accessibility of the vaccine as well as mistrust towards the vaccine including adverse effects, vaccine composition and effectiveness. Conclusion: The study provided refined information from the perspectives of users to orient the policies regarding the promotion of influenza vaccine by decision makers among these two high risk groups.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAgedAttitudeFemaleHumansPerceptionPregnancyTunisiaInfluenza Vaccinesbarriershigh-risk groupsinflluenzaqualitative studyvaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID37655288
PMCPMC10466396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.