Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655178›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

RibDif2: expanding amplicon analysis to full genomes.

Robert Murphy, Mikael Lenz Strube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert MurphySection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Mikael Lenz StrubeDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-5705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: As previously described, amplicon analysis of the bacterial 16S gene has several limitations owing to fundamental characteristics of both the 16S gene and technological restrictions. Previously, RibDif was introduced to help quantify these limitations by detailed analysis of a given genera and the 16S gene profile of its members, notably multiplicity and divergence of 16S alleles within genomes as well as shared alleles between species. Apart from using amplicon analysis for only the 16S gene, amplicons derived from genus-specific genes or even functional genes are increasingly being utilized. Moreover, long-read technologies are progressively being used to sequence longer amplicons, and since these inherently contain more information, they may likely alleviate the issues proposed in RibDif. Results: Taking these phenomena into account, we here propose RibDif2. RibDif2 retains the 16S-optimized functionality of the original RibDif but can now run any set of primers on any part of the genome in any set of organisms, be it prokaryote, eukaryote, or archaea. We demonstrate this new functionality by showing full species resolution of Availability and implementation: Ribdif2 is freely available at https://github.com/Rob-murphys/ribdif.

Identifiers

PMID37655178
PMCPMC10466081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.