Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655117›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2023

Teleconsultations for mental health: Recommendations from a Delphi panel.

Valeria Manera, Claudia Partos, Olivier Beauchet, Michel Benoit, Benjamin Dupetit, Julia Elbaum, Roxane Fabre, Morgane Gindt, Auriane Gros, Rachid Guerchouche and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Valeria ManeraCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Claudia PartosBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Olivier BeauchetDepartments of Medicine and geriatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michel BenoitCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Benjamin DupetitNextfeeling, Cannes, France.
Julia ElbaumCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Roxane FabreCôte d'Azur University, Nice University Hospital, Public Health Department, Nice, France.
Morgane GindtCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Auriane GrosCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Rachid GuerchoucheCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Stefan KlöppelUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexandra KönigCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Annick MartinVille de Nice, Nice, France.
Aurélie MoutonCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Marie-Pierre PancraziCentre Hopitalier de Bastia, Bastia, France.
Antonios PolitisDepartment of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Gabriel RobertAcademic Psychiatry Department, Guillaume Régnier Hospital, Rennes, France.
Guillaume SaccoCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Sabrina SacconiUniversité Cote d'Azur, Peripheral Nervous System and Muscle Department, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.
Kim SawchukDepartment of Communication Studies, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Fabio SolariDepartment of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy.
Lucille ThiebotProvence Alpes Agglomération, Digne-les-Bains, France.
Pietro Davide TrimarchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Radia ZeghariCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Philippe RobertCobTeK laboratory, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of teleconsultations for mental health has drastically increased since 2020 due to the Covid19 pandemic. In the present paper, we aimed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of teleconsultations for mental health compared to face-to-face consultations, and to provide recommendations in this domain. Methods: The recommendations were gathered using a Delphi methodology. The expert panel (N = 21) included professionals from the health and ICT domains. They answered questions via two rounds of web surveys, and then discussed the results in a plenary meeting. Some of the questions were also shared with non-experts (N = 104). Results: Both the experts and the non-experts with teleconsultation experience reported a general satisfaction concerning teleconsultations. A SWOT analysis revealed several strengths and opportunities of teleconsultations for mental health, but also several weaknesses and threats. The experts provided a set of practical recommendations for the preparation and organization of teleconsultations for mental health. Discussion: Teleconsultations for mental health have the potential to allow access to care for patients in remote and isolated areas. Thus, their use will unlikely be discontinued after the end of the pandemic. In this context, we suggest that the collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and interface designers is crucial to improve usability and user experience for both clinicians and patients. The importance of teaching teleconsultation skills and informing the public on the features of teleconsultations (e.g., data privacy/security) is also highlighted.

Indexed as

Mental healthRecommendationsSWOT analysisTeleconsultationsTelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID37655117
PMCPMC10465930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.