Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37655047›Full record

ArticleAdvances in methods and practices in psychological science

iCatcher+: Robust and Automated Annotation of Infants' and Young Children's Gaze Behavior From Videos Collected in Laboratory, Field, and Online Studies.

Yotam Erel, Katherine Adams Shannon, Junyi Chu, Kim Scott, Melissa Kline Struhl, Peng Cao, Xincheng Tan, Peter Hart, Gal Raz, Sabrina Piccolo and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in methods and practices in psychological science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. UpStory: the uppsala storytelling dataset.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Validation of an open source, remote web-based eye-tracking method (WebGazer) for research in early childhood.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Yotam ErelThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Katherine Adams ShannonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4069-9576
Junyi ChuDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kim ScottDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8356-3129
Melissa Kline StruhlDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Peng CaoComputer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Xincheng TanSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Peter HartDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Gal RazDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sabrina PiccoloDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Catherine MeiDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Christine PotterDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
Sagi Jaffe-DaxThe School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8759-6980
Casey Lew-WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Joshua TenenbaumDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Katherine FairchildThe MIT Quest for Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Amit BermanoThe Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Shari LiuDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-5401
Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences · USTel Aviv University · ILMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USPalo Alto University · USPrinceton University · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

Navigating two languages: Effects of everyday language switching on bilingual infants and toddlersR01HD095912 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BYERS-HEINLEIN, KRISTA, LEW-WILLIAMS, CASEY · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Testing a Framework of Environmental Adaptation in Children's Learning StrategiesF32HD105705 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHANNON, KATHERINE ADAMS · 2021 to 2023
$207k
Neural foundations of learning, reasoning, and surprise in human infantsF32HD103363 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LIU, SHARI · 2020 to 2022
$189k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD103363NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD105705NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances in psychological research have enabled large-scale studies of human behavior and streamlined pipelines for automatic processing of data. However, studies of infants and children have not fully reaped these benefits because the behaviors of interest, such as gaze duration and direction, still have to be extracted from video through a laborious process of manual annotation, even when these data are collected online. Recent advances in computer vision raise the possibility of automated annotation of these video data. In this article, we built on a system for automatic gaze annotation in young children, iCatcher, by engineering improvements and then training and testing the system (referred to hereafter as iCatcher+) on three data sets with substantial video and participant variability (214 videos collected in U.S. lab and field sites, 143 videos collected in Senegal field sites, and 265 videos collected via webcams in homes; participant age range = 4 months-3.5 years). When trained on each of these data sets, iCatcher+ performed with near human-level accuracy on held-out videos on distinguishing "LEFT" versus "RIGHT" and "ON" versus "OFF" looking behavior across all data sets. This high performance was achieved at the level of individual frames, experimental trials, and study videos; held across participant demographics (e.g., age, race/ethnicity), participant behavior (e.g., movement, head position), and video characteristics (e.g., luminance); and generalized to a fourth, entirely held-out online data set. We close by discussing next steps required to fully automate the life cycle of online infant and child behavioral studies, representing a key step toward enabling robust and high-throughput developmental research.

Indexed as

cognitive developmentdeep learningeye trackingonline data collectionopen source

Identifiers

PMID37655047
PMCPMC10471135
OpenAlexW4366425751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.