ArticleCureus2023
Pulmonary Function Test: Relationship Between Adolescent Swimmers and Finswimmers.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparisons of Respiratory Function and Cardiorespiratory Responses Induced by the Modified Shuttle Walk Test in Children Finswimmers and Age-Matched Sedentary Non-Athletes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Growth and Body Surface Area on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: A Cohort Study in Preadolescent Female Swimmers.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of our study was to investigate the effects of training on the static and dynamic respiratory parameters in adolescent female swimmers (SWs) and finswimmers (FSWs).
methodsForty-six female adolescent SWs (n=24, age=17.6±0.7 years) and FSWs (n=22, age=17.0±1.2 years) volunteered for this study. All participants underwent standard spirometry and lung volume measurements and were collected anthropometrical and morphological characteristics.
resultsThe results of the groups in the pulmonary function test parameters, namely, inspiratory capacity (IC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), were significantly different. Higher values of IC, ERV, and PEF were observed in the FSW group than the SW group: IC = 116.5±13.2 (SWs) vs. 125.5±11.5 (FSWs) % of predicted, p = 0.019; ERV = 121.8±14.8 (SWs) vs. 130.6±12.5 (FSWs) % of predicted, p = 0.036; PEF = 111.6±7.5 (SWs) vs. 116.3±5.0 (FSWs) % of predicted, p = 0.018.
conclusionThe differences between groups probably reflect the activation of different muscle groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.