ArticleCureus2023
Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Tumors Before the Milan System: A Ten-Year Experience From a Tertiary Care Center in Greece.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Parotid Gland Swellings.Cureus · 2025Article
- MRI and CT imaging characteristics in parotid tumors with false-negative fine-needle aspirations.Head & face medicine · 2024Article
- Fine needle aspiration vs. surgical pathology specimen in salivary gland tumors: a study of diagnostic accuracy and predictive value.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for salivary gland tumors. Methodology A retrospective file analysis of patients with salivary gland pathology, attending the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of a tertiary care center in Athens, Greece, over a 10-year-long period, was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prognostic value (PPV), and negative prognostic value (NPV) of FNAC for benign and malignant tumors separately were assessed and compared with histology. Results A total of 82 patients (46 male and 36 female) with salivary gland tumors, submitted to both FNAC and histology, were included. The mean age was 55 years. A total of 73 tumors were histologically diagnosed as benign and nine as malignant. FNAC identified 62 benign and seven malignant tumors but was inconclusive in 13 cases. The most common diagnosis of both histology and FNAC was pleomorphic adenoma. FNAC sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 98.3% and 100%, 87.5% and 100%, 97.1% and 100%, 98.3% and 100%, and 87.5% and 100% for benign and malignant tumors, respectively. Conclusions FNAC is highly sensitive but moderately specific for the preoperative identification of benign salivary gland tumors. Its use as an initial diagnostic modality is warranted, thanks to its safeness, rapidity, and lack of pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.