Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37654864›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2023

Knowledge and training of Italian students in Healthcare Settings on COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination strategies, one year after the immunization campaign.

Angela Bechini, Alfredo Vannacci, Cristina Salvati, Giada Crescioli, Niccolò Lombardi, Fabrizio Chiesi, Jonida Shtylla, Marco Del Riccio, Paolo Bonanni, Sara Boccalini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela BechiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alfredo VannacciDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Cristina SalvatiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giada CrescioliDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Niccolò LombardiDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Fabrizio ChiesiCentral Tuscany LHU, Florence, Italy.
Jonida ShtyllaSIAF - Digital Learning and IT Training Process Unit, Area for the Innovation and Management of Information and Computer Systems, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marco Del RiccioDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Paolo BonanniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sara BoccaliniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines represent an important opportunity for defeating the disease, as long as high vaccination acceptance rates are achieved. Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a relevant role in the promotion of immunization among the population and since students in healthcare area will be HCWs it is crucial to provide more in-depth knowledge on vaccinations. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmaceutical area students regarding COVID-19 vaccination and the impact of a specific Elective Teaching Activity (ETA) on the increase of students' knowledge. The ETA was held one year after the immunization campaign in Italy. Methods: Students' knowledge was tested with a questionnaire before and after attending the course. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse the results obtained. Student's t-tests for paired data were used. Results: Overall, 387 students at the University of Florence attended the course and took the same test before and after the ETA on COVID-19 vaccines. Despite achieving satisfactory average scores in the pre-course test (26/32 ± 4.0), all students were able to significantly enhance their final score (+17.1%; p < 0.001), indicating that the ETA was highly effective in improving their knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination. Medical students demonstrated a better comprehension of the role of the medical specialist in public health in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, while some uncertainties were revealed regarding the role of pharmacists. Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that specific training activities on vaccination are effective for implementing the knowledge of future health professionals.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunizationItalyVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesElective training activitiesHCWsMedical educationPublic healthSARS-CoV-2 vaccine

Identifiers

PMID37654864
PMCPMC10468188
OpenAlexW4386347224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.