Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37654810›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2023

Understanding care coordination for Veterans with complex care needs: protocol of a multiple-methods study to build evidence for an effectiveness and implementation study.

Denise M Hynes, Diana J Govier, Meike Niederhausen, Anaïs Tuepker, Avery Z Laliberte, Holly McCready, Alex Hickok, Mazhgan Rowneki, Dylan Waller, Kristina M Cordasco and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Denise M HynesCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Diana J GovierCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Meike NiederhausenCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Anaïs TuepkerCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Avery Z LaliberteCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Holly McCreadyCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Alex HickokCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Mazhgan RownekiCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Dylan WallerCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Kristina M CordascoCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sara J SingerDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Kathryn M McDonaldCenter for Diagnostic Excellence, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Christopher G SlatoreCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Kathleen C ThomasDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Matthew MaciejewskiCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States.
Catherine BattagliaDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, United States.
Lisa PerlaRehabilitation Services, Veterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC, United States.
VA Portland Health Care System · USOregon Health & Science University · USCenter for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior · USDurham VA Health Care System · USNational Patient Safety Foundation · USStanford University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · US

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX003261HSRD VA IK6 HX003395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For patients with complex health and social needs, care coordination is crucial for improving their access to care, clinical outcomes, care experiences, and controlling their healthcare costs. However, evidence is inconsistent regarding the core elements of care coordination interventions, and lack of standardized processes for assessing patients' needs has made it challenging for providers to optimize care coordination based on patient needs and preferences. Further, ensuring providers have reliable and timely means of communicating about care plans, patients' full spectrum of needs, and transitions in care is important for overcoming potential care fragmentation. In the Veterans Health Administration (VA), several initiatives are underway to implement care coordination processes and services. In this paper, we describe our study underway in the VA aimed at building evidence for designing and implementing care coordination practices that enhance care integration and improve health and care outcomes for Veterans with complex care needs. Methods: In a prospective observational multiple methods study, for Aim 1 we will use existing data to identify Veterans with complex care needs who have and have not received care coordination services. We will examine the relationship between receipt of care coordination services and their health outcomes. In Aim 2, we will adapt the Patient Perceptions of Integrated Veteran Care questionnaire to survey a sample of Veterans about their experiences regarding coordination, integration, and the extent to which their care needs are being met. For Aim 3, we will interview providers and care teams about their perceptions of the innovation attributes of current care coordination needs assessment tools and processes, including their improvement over other approaches (relative advantage), fit with current practices (compatibility and innovation fit), complexity, and ability to visualize how the steps proceed to impact the right care at the right time (observability). The provider interviews will inform design and deployment of a widescale provider survey. Discussion: Taken together, our study will inform development of an enhanced care coordination intervention that seeks to improve care and outcomes for Veterans with complex care needs.

Indexed as

access to carecare coordinationcare integrationstudy protocolVeterans

Identifiers

PMID37654810
PMCPMC10465329
OpenAlexW4385953070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.