ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023
Randomized controlled trial of a group peer mentoring model for U.S. academic medicine research faculty.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fostering trustworthy dialogue on race, ethnicity and gender in a mentoring and leadership program for academic medicine faculty.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Pandemic Impact on Research Faculty in Academic Medicine: A Mixed Method Study.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Assessing the Intercultural Competence of Faculty in Academic Medicine and Health Professions: Concepts and Metrics.Journal of health equity · 2025Article
- Group coaching for career development: Supporting the endangered early career researcher.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Implementation and evaluation of a group peer mentoring and leadership development program for research faculty in academic medicine.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Finding the right fit: How mentor-mentee fit impacts outcomes for academic mentees.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Facilitated Peer Group Mentoring for Underrepresented Biomedical Researchers: Facilitators' Experiences and Implications for Dissemination of a Curriculum.The chronicle of mentoring & coaching · 2024Article
- Psychological Safety: Creating a Transformative Culture in a Faculty Group Peer-Mentoring Intervention.The chronicle of mentoring & coaching · 2024Article
- Group peer mentoring is effective for different demographic groups of biomedical research faculty: A controlled trial.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Midcareer is a critical transition point for biomedical research faculty and a common dropout point from an NIH-funded career. We report a study to assess the efficacy of a group peer mentoring program for diverse biomedical researchers in academic medicine, seeking to improve vitality, career advancement, and cross-cultural competence. Methods: We conducted a stratified randomized controlled trial with a waitlist control group involving 40 purposefully diverse early midcareer research faculty from 16 states who had a first-time NIH R01 (or equivalent) award, a K training grant, or a similar major grant. The yearlong intervention (2 to 3 days quarterly) consisted of facilitated, structured, group peer mentoring. Main study aims were to enhance faculty vitality, self-efficacy in achieving research success, career advancement, mentoring others, and cultural awareness and appreciation of diversity in the workplace. Results: Compared to the control group, the intervention group's increased vitality did not reach statistical significance ( Conclusions: The mentoring intervention resulted in meaningful change in important dimensions and skills among a national sample of diverse early midcareer biomedical faculty. This mentoring program holds promise for addressing the urgencies of sustaining faculty vitality and cross-cultural competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.