ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2023
Tailored Precision: A Unique Case of Pelvic Osteosarcoma Management.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteosarcoma of the pelvis poses challenges in surgical resection due to its anatomical location and extensive nature. This case report focuses on the clinical presentation and therapeutic outcomes of a 20-year-old patient with osteosarcoma of the right iliac bone. The study highlights the efficacy of 3D printing technology in creating customized implants for improved surgical outcomes. Case Report: The case report presents the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of a patient with osteosarcoma of the right iliac bone. It emphasizes the impact of surgical resection extent and endoprosthetic reconstruction. The study highlights the advantages of 3D printing technology in creating customized implants that accurately fit the remaining bone. Limb-sparing surgery is advocated for better functional and psychological outcomes compared to amputation. The report also emphasizes the need for further research on alternative composite materials and discusses the limitations of 3D printing technology in orthopedics.The limitations of 3D printing, such as mechanical safety and material restrictions, are discussed, calling for future advancements to improve the reliability and effectiveness of 3D-printed implants in orthopedics. Conclusion: The present case report provides valuable perspectives into the efficacious management of pelvic osteosarcoma and underscores the distinctive advantages of 3D printing technology in improving surgical results. Limb-sparing surgery demonstrates enhanced functional and psychological outcomes compared to amputation. Utilizing 3D custom-made implants, significantly reduces the likelihood of revision surgeries attributed to implant failure, improves the surgical outcome and precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.